Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

Thank you for the confirmation Mark. -Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 2:41 PM To: Montanez, Victor; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action This is an EXTERNAL

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

On 07/15/2016 11:08 AM, Montanez, Victor wrote: > Hello Mark, > > For the possible alternative you mention below: > > If we do set up the unsubscribe policy to "yes" and in the "unsubscribe > MODERATORPASSWD address=user@example" command we include the moderator/owner > password would that acco

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

56 AM To: mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action This is an EXTERNAL EMAIL. Stop and think before clicking links or opening attachments. * On 07/15/2016 09:34 AM, Montanez, Victor wrote: >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

On 07/15/2016 09:34 AM, Montanez, Victor wrote: > Can the list owners send a command via email to unsubscribe users of > a list that will NOT cause a confirmation email to be generated to > the subscribers? Only if the admin knows the user's list password. If so, the admin can send the command u

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

Can the list owners send a command via email to unsubscribe users of a list that will NOT cause a confirmation email to be generated to the subscribers? We want to send an email to mailman to remove subscribers without requiring confirmation from the subscribed users. All settings I have tried

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 and Python 2.4.1

Sorry, I haven't fully searched the FAQ and archives--I'm also guessing I wouldn't find the answer if I did. Does someone know without research whether Mailman 2.1.2 will run under Python 2.4.1. (Due to a disk failure, we're having to replace the build of a server, while mailman is running happ

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:38:01 -0700, you wrote: >On 9/12/2003 9:57, "Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, it is. At this point I've only got one subscriber to a test list >> - me. I have no good way to tell if it will send to a different >> domain... > >Get yourself a free em

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On 9/12/2003 9:57, "Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it is. At this point I've only got one subscriber to a test list > - me. I have no good way to tell if it will send to a different > domain... Get yourself a free email account (on Yahoo or wherever) and subscribe it to

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of Michael W. Cocke >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:53 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail > > > >I just noticed that when I have mailman running (for what THAT'S >worth), the syst

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

I just noticed that when I have mailman running (for what THAT'S worth), the system bogs down hopelessly. I MUST have this thing set up wrong, but darned if I see what I did! I've tried following the INSTALL file that comes with mailman, but I guess I'm too stupid - is there a blooming idiots g

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

IL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of Michael W. Cocke >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:44 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail > >On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:04:50 -0500, you wrote: > >>If you are using

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:04:50 -0500, you wrote: >If you are using the RPM that came with RH9, that's your problem...it's >broken. Remove the RPM and install from source. > >Mike I Already did that twice, but thanks for the suggestion. Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will s

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:20:04 -0400, you wrote: >Does "mailmanctl stop" kill all the mailman processes or does the >Outgoing queue stay up? Looks like it kills everything. >Which version of python are you running? Python 2.2.2 Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive.

[Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

using redhat 9, sendmail 8.12.8, mailman 2.1.2 I can access the web interface, send messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not receive any error replies. What I cannot do is get any mail from mailman. If I subscribe to a list, I don't receive the confirmation message. If I send a message to [EMAIL

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 rpm for RH 7.3

Mailman users, I'm in the process of writing documentation geared to newbie's looking to install an all-in-one server with RH 7.3 as the base. You can find more at www.pfohlsolutions.com/projects/server/. I wanted the latest version of Mailman so I packaged the rpm to work with a standard install

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 and htdig again.

Richard Barrett wrote: > Sorry not to respond before but I just got back from a week away and found your post to mailman-users list. Hey it's all good :) I only just posted it anyway :)--I hope your week away was good. It's nice to be able to take some time off and relax now again! > As you look

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 and htdig again.

Glenn Sorry not to respond before but I just got back from a week away and found your post to mailman-users list. As you look to be using https scheme for accessing your list archives, I think you have tripped over a problem that htdig-2.1.2-0.4.patch already fixes. The INSTALL.htdig-mm for th

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 breaks s/mime

Hello mailman-users, I haven't been able to find an option to disable mime mangling, as this breaks quite a number of things such as s/mime signed emails... -- Best regards, Duane mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Guns don't kill people. Postmen kill people. http://www.cac

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 and htdig again.

Ok. I've finally got some time (between work and things going on with my parents lately) to try and fix this problem. I've moved my old mailman directory. I've reconfigured and recompiled 2.1.2 with the following patches (in order): indexing-2.1.2-0.1.patch htdig-2.1.2-0.3.patch templates-2.1.2-0

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

This, along with per-domain create passwords are by far at the top of my feature wish-list. Aliasing is a royal PITA because it is a completely manual process which gets completely out of hand when you are hosting many domains/lists on one machine. On Thursday 31 July 2003 11:42 am, Glenn Sieb

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 13:42, Glenn Sieb wrote: > Jim Breton said: > > I have set up the above on a FreeBSD 4.7 system with the intention of > > being able to host per-virtual-domain mailing lists. > > Yay! Another FBSD user! :) > > > I want to be able to have: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

Jim Breton said: > I have set up the above on a FreeBSD 4.7 system with the intention of > being able to host per-virtual-domain mailing lists. Yay! Another FBSD user! :) > I want to be able to have: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > as completely separate, autonomous lists. Ca

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

Hi all, I have set up the above on a FreeBSD 4.7 system with the intention of being able to host per-virtual-domain mailing lists. I want to be able to have: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as completely separate, autonomous lists. First, is this even possible using stock Mailman? And

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.6 withpostfix

At 10:42 PM +0200 2003/07/30, Gerben Wierda wrote: But what is not working is mail. No message is being sent, nothing appears in postfix's logs nor in mailman's logs. Without clues I have no idea on how to debug this. Is there anyone who can help me out? Have you send the FAQ entry at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.6 with postfix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerben Wierda wrote: > But what is not working is mail. No message is being sent, nothing > appears in postfix's logs nor in mailman's logs. Without clues I have > no idea on how to debug this. So you send mail to a list and there is nothing in the

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.6 with postfix

I hope this is the right address for this message. I have installed Mailman on my Mac OS X 10.2.6 system where a recent postfix is running. The administrative interface to mailman is working and the web interface to that admin interface as well. But what is not working is mail. No message is b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 + Apache 2.0.47

> "DB" == Dhruba Bandopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DB> Has anyone got latest release of mailman working with apache2? If so, DB> how? And if not, what problems did you have? When will mailman support DB> for apache2 be official? Works just fine. Mailman is just a CGI program as far

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 + Apache 2.0.47

Hello, I was having this strange problem of mailman rejecting messages from subscribed members because it thought that those members were actually non-members. So it passed them on for moderation. Now, I am using Apache HTTPD 2.0.47 and I'm thinking whether this could be the cause of this very o

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2

s for the help. Joe -Original Message- From: Richard Barrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:50 AM To: jsmith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 At 16:00 26/06/2003, jsmith wrote: >Hello all, > >I have had the unfortunate problem of the p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2

At 16:00 26/06/2003, jsmith wrote: Hello all, I have had the unfortunate problem of the place that hosts my collocated server move data centers from one coast to the other. And it seems to have broke a few things. I am running FreeBSD 4.7 with Sendmail. I made sure qrunner was started and sendma

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2

Hello all, I have had the unfortunate problem of the place that hosts my collocated server move data centers from one coast to the other. And it seems to have broke a few things. I am running FreeBSD 4.7 with Sendmail. I made sure qrunner was started and sendmail is working as far as I can tell

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.2 (htdig???)

On 24/06/2003 ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: > Did Richard finally include his htdig (etc..) patches in 2.1.2? > I haven't seen them at the SF download site. i propose to use another external archiver like lurker. lurker has a very mighty search function and provides many more options. see http://lurk

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.2 (htdig???)

At 11:31 24/06/2003, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: Did Richard finally include his htdig (etc..) patches in 2.1.2? I haven't seen them at the SF download site. They have not been folded into the main MM source and the patches are still available on sourceforge. In total I would advise you to apply

[Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.2 (htdig???)

Did Richard finally include his htdig (etc..) patches in 2.1.2? I haven't seen them at the SF download site. cheers - wash +--+-+ Odhiambo Washington, [EMAIL PROTECTED] . WANANCHI ONLINE LTD (Nairobi, KE)

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 Multipart/mixed issues in Pipermailarchives...

Good Morning, I couldn't find a bug report on this nor did I find a solution in the archives, but I somtimes don't do proper searches. I did see references to similar issues on the developers list, but nothing with regards to the archives nor a solution. We are having problems with mail

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, postfix, openbsd 3.3 quietly fails

Hi all, I'm stumped. I have mailman 2.1.2 running on openbsd 3.3, with postfix and python 2.2 When I post to my lists (which used to work on my previous install of all these), I get nearly silent failure. The only trace of the mail is from /var/log/maillog : Jun 17 00:14:36 lemieux postfix/loc