Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
There was an issue in the tarballs I released for Mailman 2.1.15rc1. They didn't include the updated version information so they installed as version 2.1.14. This should not cause problems other than the version displaying incorrectly. If the tarball was installed as an upgrade over a 2.1.14 insta

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-18 Thread Mark Sapiro
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > >--On 17. Mai 2012 12:58:11 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: > >>> I see that it's still calls itself 2.1.14. I hope I didn't miss >>> anything.. >> >> >> Where do you see it identify itself as 2.1.14? If properly installed, >> it should identify itself as 2.1.15rc1. > >Well, t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-18 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 17. Mai 2012 12:58:11 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote: I see that it's still calls itself 2.1.14. I hope I didn't miss anything.. Where do you see it identify itself as 2.1.14? If properly installed, it should identify itself as 2.1.15rc1. Well, the web site still says 2.1.14 and I found this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Odhiambo Washington wrote: >Thanks. I have now installed this on my site. > >I see that it's still calls itself 2.1.14. I hope I didn't miss anything.. Where do you see it identify itself as 2.1.14? If properly installed, it should identify itself as 2.1.15rc1. -- Mark Sapiro The highw

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-17 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > >In the mean time, you can just apply the > > patch. You should > >see only line number offsets and no rejects when applying this patch, > >and it should work. > > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mark Sapiro wrote: > >In the mean time, you can just apply the > patch. You should >see only line number offsets and no rejects when applying this patch, >and it should work. There is now an index_htdig.patch.2.1.15 patch with correct line numbe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >Please let me know when these patches are updated. I can then start testing >2.1.5. >I wouldn't want to inconvenience those who use the web-based search. In the mean time, you can just apply the patch. You should

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-16 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > >Do I still need these patches for 2.1.15: > > > >htdig-patch > >indexing-patch > > > >I can't seem to find them though:( > > > My version of these patches has been combined into a single > index_htdig.patch wh

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >Do I still need these patches for 2.1.15: > >htdig-patch >indexing-patch > >I can't seem to find them though:( My version of these patches has been combined into a single index_htdig.patch which you can find at and

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.15rc1 released

2012-05-15 Thread Mark Sapiro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am happy to announce the first release candidate for Mailman 2.1.15. Python 2.4 is the minimum supported, but Python 2.6 is recommended. This release should work with Python 2.7, but has not been tested with that version. This release includes mino