Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread J C Lawrence
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:47:34 -0500 Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's just too much like saying RTFM! :) `apt-get install exim` -- J C Lawrence -(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil,

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Jim Popovitch
> -Original Message- > From: Keith Mastin > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 9:46 PM > > How's this for a reply: man sendmail > :) > That's just too much like saying RTFM! :) -Jim P. -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Keith Mastin
>> -Original Message- >> From: Jon Carnes >> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 3:33 PM >> >> In my experience, Sendmail is not an optimized MTA. > >Here is where I jump in... :) Sendmail is easily optimized, but most people >who install it don't need that kind of setup and config. Send

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Keith Mastin
>At 03:00 PM 2/16/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >>Hope I'm not too far out of line here, but I gotta say it. If this is your >>first mail server, you might find that postfix is easier to setup and >>understand. Virtual tables make a lot more sense and you can edit the >>config file (main.cf) directly ra

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Jim Popovitch
> -Original Message- > From: Jon Carnes > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 3:33 PM > > In my experience, Sendmail is not an optimized MTA. Here is where I jump in... :) Sendmail is easily optimized, but most people who install it don't need that kind of setup and config. Sendmail is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Jon Carnes
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 15:00, Keith Mastin wrote: > > Hope I'm not too far out of line here, but I gotta say it. If this is your > first mail server, you might find that postfix is easier to setup and > understand. Virtual tables make a lot more sense and you can edit the > config file (main.cf)

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Keith Mastin
>I recently installed Mailman 2.1.1 on a RedHat 8 box. I'd like the one >machine to be a listserver for two domains: www.tcf.ua.edu and >www.cinemastudies.org (which is set up as a virtual host on Apache 1.3.27). > >Mailman seems to be set okay on www.tcf.ua.edu, but when I tried something >si

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Jon Carnes
Read: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html The DNS mx records for cinemastudies.org and tcf.ua.edu must both point to your mailserver. Your Mailserver must have both domains setup as local names (/etc/mail/local-host-names -- or something like that). You might also want to put the doma

[Mailman-Users] Mailman's Host Name & sendmail's Virtual Users

2003-02-16 Thread Jeremy Butler
I recently installed Mailman 2.1.1 on a RedHat 8 box. I'd like the one machine to be a listserver for two domains: www.tcf.ua.edu and www.cinemastudies.org (which is set up as a virtual host on Apache 1.3.27). Mailman seems to be set okay on www.tcf.ua.edu, but when I tried something similar