[Mailman-Users] MHonArc - email from web interface?

The mailing list archive at https://lists.shef.ac.uk/sympa has options on the web interface (a) to send an email from the archive to you, and, separately, (b) to allow you to reply via the web interface. It uses Sympa 5.3.4 with MHonArc 2.6.16.  Are these features of MHonArc or of Sympa?  If t

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

Mark Sapiro wrote: > Just for fun, I applied both the prerequisite modinc-2.1.12-0.1.patch > and the mhonarc-2.1.12-0.1.patch to Mailman 2.1.18-1 OK, it's raining here (hooray!) and a slow day, so I went further and created . This is Richard's

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

On 12/05/2014 01:14 PM, Karl Zander wrote: > > Pipermail seems place the file into separate URL and give it a generic > filename. Maybe I am missing some setting and Pipermail can keep the > message and attachment together? You're probably not overlooking any setting. The pipermail archiver re

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:19:20 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote: Just for fun, I applied both the prerequisite modinc-2.1.12-0.1.patch and the mhonarc-2.1.12-0.1.patch to Mailman 2.1.18-1 Both patches failed to patch Mailman/Version.py because the 2.1.18-1 DATA_FILE_VERSION is 105 and in 2.1.12 it was

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:05:58 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: I doubt that has been updated. Recently, most users seem to prefer the bundled archiver (Pipermail), or 3rd party services. Richard used to be a regular on Mailman channels but I haven't seen him for a while. My main intere

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

On 12/04/2014 05:05 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > After a quick look at the patch I'd guess a 50% change that nothing > relevant to MHonArc except the version number has changed since > 2.1.12, and a 90% chance that any fixes needed are *very* simple. > Have you tried that patch and had it fa

[Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

Karl Zander writes: > The Mailman FAQ indicates patches are available at > http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html > > The patches listed there are up to version 2.1.12 of > Mailman. Anyone aware of any patches for Mailman 2.1.18? > Or even 2.1.17? I doubt that has bee

[Mailman-Users] MHonArc Patch for Mailman

I realize MHonArc is not part of Mailman. The Mailman FAQ indicates patches are available at http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html The patches listed there are up to version 2.1.12 of Mailman. Anyone aware of any patches for Mailman 2.1.18? Or even 2.1.17? Thank you --K

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

On 07/18/2014 11:20 AM, Peter Knowles wrote: > > When I run the other patches, it'd report something like "Hunk #1 > succeed at 12 (offset -1 lines).", compared to when I ran your patch (as > directed above) it only spits out "patching file Mailman/Mailbox.py" > with no indication whether it was s

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

Mark, One last question, as I'm a bit of novice when it comes to the "patch" command. When I run the other patches, it'd report something like "Hunk #1 succeed at 12 (offset -1 lines).", compared to when I ran your patch (as directed above) it only spits out "patching file Mailman/Mailbox.py" wit

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

On 07/18/2014 10:59 AM, Peter Knowles wrote: > Mark, > > I hate to be a pest. > > 1. I saved your patch in "/usr/src" > > 2. I enter the folder "/usr/src/mailman-2.1.18-1" > > 3. I run "patch -p1 < ../Mailbox.py.patch" > > 4. The following message is presented: > > (Stripping trailing CRs fro

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

Mark, I hate to be a pest. 1. I saved your patch in "/usr/src" 2. I enter the folder "/usr/src/mailman-2.1.18-1" 3. I run "patch -p1 < ../Mailbox.py.patch" 4. The following message is presented: (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) can't find file to patch at input line 3 Perhaps you used the

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

On 07/18/2014 10:40 AM, Peter Knowles wrote: > > So if I understand correctly, based on your patch, I apply things in the > following order: > > 1. modinc.patch > 2. mhonarc.patch > 3. Mailbox.py.patch > > *** the latter patch addressing what the "mhonarc" patch didn't due to > Mailman changes t

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

Mark, So if I understand correctly, based on your patch, I apply things in the following order: 1. modinc.patch 2. mhonarc.patch 3. Mailbox.py.patch *** the latter patch addressing what the "mhonarc" patch didn't due to Mailman changes that were made post-patch release. *** Best Regards, Peter

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

On 07/18/2014 12:10 AM, Peter Knowles wrote: > > The only error that remains when applying the "mhonarc" patch is: > > Hulk #2 FAILED at 106. > 1 out of 2 hulks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Mailbox.py.rej The problem with the patch is that the file it is based on ended at the point

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

Mark, First off, to clarify, yes we're using version 2.1.18-1. Next, the "Version.py" issue has been resolved. I had forgotten to apply the "modinc" prerequisite patch. The only error that remains when applying the "mhonarc" patch is: Hulk #2 FAILED at 106. 1 out of 2 hulks FAILED -- saving rej

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

> > During the patching process, here is the error produced: It would help if you actually provided the content of the .rej files. Also, Are you really patching 2.1.8 or did you mean 2.1.18? > Hunk #2 FAILED at 106. > 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Mailbox.py.rej

[Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch

Hi, Is anyone familiar with the "mhonarc" patch found at: http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/ It seems when applied to 2.1.8, it cannot seem to patch "Mailboxes.py" and "Version.py". During the patching process, here is the error produced: Hunk #2 FAILED at 106. 1 out of 2 hunks FAIL

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc and non-world-readable archives problem

Frank Cusack wrote: > >I looked over the patch and didn't see any umask changes. Maybe >it was another patch that did something. Anyway ... I changed >the MHONARC_ARCHIVER_PATH option to include '-umask 002' and >it works. That's good enough for me. So it seems that with the patch installed an

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc and non-world-readable archives problem

On January 7, 2007 5:25:49 PM -0800 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Frank Cusack wrote: > >> I've built mailman-2.1.9 with the mhonarc patch >> (http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html) and it works >> great. I am running on Solaris 10 with python 2.5. >> >> The problem I

Re: [Mailman-Users] mhonarc and non-world-readable archives problem

Frank Cusack wrote: >I've built mailman-2.1.9 with the mhonarc patch >(http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html) and it works >great. I am running on Solaris 10 with python 2.5. > >The problem I have is that the list archives are not created world-readable. > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/va

[Mailman-Users] mhonarc and non-world-readable archives problem

I've built mailman-2.1.9 with the mhonarc patch (http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html) and it works great. I am running on Solaris 10 with python 2.5. The problem I have is that the list archives are not created world-readable. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/mailman/archives/public]#

[Mailman-Users] mhonarc patch 2.1.6 and mailman 2.1.7

Hey everyone! Have a bit of a problem happening, and I'm hoping it's an easy fix... I went to set up the mhonarc patch with mailman 2.1.7 tonight. I know, I know.. different versions (2.1.6 patch for mhonarc versus mailman 2.1.7), so I'm taking my life in my hands.. but it seemed to apply cleanly

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mhonarc vs. Pipermail

Jacques B. Siboni wrote: > >-- if it appears pipermail is better is there a piece of software to convert >ancient archives to pipermail or do i have to make it myself? If you have a Unix like mbox file with your archived messages, you can use bin/arch to build a pipermail archive from it. See http

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mhonarc vs. Pipermail

On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 03:02:17PM +, Jacques B. Siboni wrote: > I used Mhonarc with majordomo and now I run mailman with pipermail > > -- should I use pipermail or mhonarc? When I migrated from majordomo to Mailman, I choose to stay with MHonArc, primarily because it was something I was fam

[Mailman-Users] Mhonarc vs. Pipermail

Dear All I have seen mails about this topic but I can't decide so far I used Mhonarc with majordomo and now I run mailman with pipermail -- should I use pipermail or mhonarc? -- if it appears pipermail is better is there a piece of software to convert ancient archives to pipermail or do i have

RE: [Mailman-Users] MHonarc and Private Archive Authentication

your input is welcome.   Regards       -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Lecza Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 3:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Mailman-Users] MHonarc and Private Archive Authentication   I follow the same

[Mailman-Users] MHonarc and Private Archive Authentication

I follow the same procedure a Guiseppe in this note: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/msg09107.html   and cannot get the Private Authentication working as he describes?  Has anyone else gotten this working?   The only thing that I have different is the location of m

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mhonarc

: J C Lawrence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:57 AM To: David Pierron Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mhonarc On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:48:24 -0500 David Pierron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are users of Mailman running Mhonarc?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mhonarc

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001 21:48:24 -0500 David Pierron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why are users of Mailman running Mhonarc? Pipermail does not fully soppport MIME, character sets, customisation of the generated HTML, alternate indexing forms, or embedded CGI behaviours such as being able to post

[Mailman-Users] Mhonarc

Why are users of Mailman running Mhonarc? Is this because the Mailman archives are not searchable? When you run Mhonarc you can use something like htDig or Gview (is it?) to search the archive ... Why can't these programs search the Mailman archive? And finally ... does anyone know how to crea

[Mailman-Users] MHonArc

hi, This seems to be a much discussed topic by looking at the archives, but I seem to have some problem that I couldnt find reference too in the archive. I have configured mailman to use the external archiver thing like this: PUBLIC_EXTERNAL_ARCHIVER = '(/opt/MHonArc/bin/mhonarc -rcfile /opt/M

[Mailman-Users] MHonArc

hi, This seems to be a much discussed topic by looking at the archives, but I seem to have some problem that I couldnt find reference too in the archive. I have configured mailman to use the external archiver thing like this: PUBLIC_EXTERNAL_ARCHIVER = '(/opt/MHonArc/bin/mhonarc -rcfile /opt/

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc

On Thu, 03 May 2001 12:51:59 -0700 Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, I'm about to start down this road too, and am thinking of > Hypermail instead because my server is pretty underpowered at this > point, MHonArc's concumption is pretty closely related to the number of messages in th

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc

Tanya Brethour wrote: > > Quick question: > > I am converting to use the mhonarc archiver instead of the builtin mailman > archiver because of the MIME attachment issue. I was curious how people > integrate the two. > > Do you turn off archiving in mailman? > Do you just run a cron job to upd

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc

On Thu, 3 May 2001 14:39:19 -0500 (CDT) Tanya Brethour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quick question: I am converting to use the mhonarc archiver > instead of the builtin mailman archiver because of the MIME > attachment issue. I was curious how people integrate the two. I subscribe a special arc

Re: [Mailman-Users] MHonArc

Dan, Thanks.. I will download the archive. I tried searching it on Python.. but I got confused as to what to enter into which text box... what things to check.. .. and nothing I entered turned up anything remotely close to what I was looking for. (Despite the hint on list.org ) -Tanya On Thu,

[Mailman-Users] MHonArc

Quick question: I am converting to use the mhonarc archiver instead of the builtin mailman archiver because of the MIME attachment issue. I was curious how people integrate the two. Do you turn off archiving in mailman? Do you just run a cron job to update the archive? In order to have it group

Re: [Mailman-Users] MhonArc Integration?

On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:03:21 -0600 Jed Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone successfully integrated MhonArc archiving with mailman? > Without having to hack it too much? Yup. See: http://www.kanga.nu/archives/ The RCs can be found here: ftp://ftp.kanga.nu/pub/Kanga.Nu/WebArc

[Mailman-Users] MhonArc Integration?

Has anyone successfully integrated MhonArc archiving with mailman? Without having to hack it too much? Thanks, Jed Daniels -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users