Leonard Jacobs wrote:
>I don't have any adjustments to the defaukt settings you mentioned in my
>mm_cfg.py file, but Defaults.py state:
>
>[user]# grep SESSIONS Mailman/Defaults.py
>SMTP_MAX_SESSIONS_PER_CONNECTION = 0
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman]# grep RCPTS Mailman/Defaults.py
>SMTP_MAX_RCPTS =
On 6/4/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Yes, I have tried all the suggestions provided earlier in FAQ 4.73 & 6.14.
Could you also trim your replies? Including several levels of
additional material from previous replies makes it very difficult to
tell who has said what, and where the new text is.
>
> ubject:
> Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected
> From:
> Leonard Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:31:01 -0400
> To:
> mailman-users@python.org
>
> To:
> mailman-users@python.org
>
> Content-Trans
On 6/4/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Yes, I have stopped & restarted Mailman after each mm_cfg.py change and
> no, there are no anti-virus or other rejections with postfix.
> Additionally I am not running SELinux on this box.
I haven't checked the earlier messages in this thread -- I'm assuming
>
> On 5/29/07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> >/ Does anybody else use Postfix 2.4?
> /
> Actually, I'm pretty sure we are currently using it on the NTP Public
> Services Project pages at ntp.isc.org, which is the project I had
> gotten involved in years ago, prior to getting involved in Mailman.
> I
Leonard Jacobs wrote:
>I am trying to run Mailman 2.1.9 on a CentOS 4 server with postfix 2.4.1. I
>had Mailman 2.1.5 running on a slower system and wanted to offload some apps
>to this newer server but am having problems. check_perms has no errors.
>Creating lists works fine and when postings
Brad Knowles wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
>
>> It is strange that a pretty vanilla installation, CentOS and
>> Postfix with the latest Mailman version of 2.1.9 is so hard to
>> configure and use.
>
> Can you share with us the relevant portions of your mm_cfg.py file,
> and your p
On 5/29/07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Does anybody else use Postfix 2.4?
Actually, I'm pretty sure we are currently using it on the NTP Public
Services Project pages at ntp.isc.org, which is the project I had
gotten involved in years ago, prior to getting involved in Mailman.
I got on this mailin
On 5/29/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> It is strange that a pretty vanilla installation, CentOS and Postfix
> with the latest Mailman version of 2.1.9 is so hard to configure and
> use.
Can you share with us the relevant portions of your mm_cfg.py file,
and your postfix/main.cf file?
Also, you
--On May 29, 2007 10:25:22 AM -0400 Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody else use Postfix 2.4?
To which I reply:
For what it's worth, my (extremely small, low-traffic) home Mailman install
(2.1.9) uses Postfix 2.4.1 with no problems.
--
Steve Burling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 29, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion to read the FAQ and the associated list
> postings. I actually found those same postings and tried every
> suggestion in them that was relevant. Unfortunately nothing work
gt;
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>1. Low level smtp error: Server not connected (Stephen J. Turnbull)
>>
>>
On 5/28/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote:
> Wish it were so simple. There are no obvious errors in the postfix
> maillog files. In fact postfix is receiving and sending messages fine,
> just no mailman messages are getting delivered except for the response
> to the list creator that the list was creat
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Low level smtp error: Server not connected (Stephen J. Turnbull)
>
> --------
>
> Subject:
Leonard Jacobs writes:
> "delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code -1: (104,
> 'Connection reset by peer')" I am also seeing many " Low level smtp
> error: Server not connected, msgid" errors.
This seems likely to be either a Postfix problem, or maybe you've
caught a social disease (ie,
I am trying to run Mailman 2.1.9 on a CentOS 4 server with postfix 2.4.1. I
had Mailman 2.1.5 running on a slower system and wanted to offload some apps to
this newer server but am having problems. check_perms has no errors. Creating
lists works fine and when postings are submitted the messages
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
>The firewall was fine... the problem was that, for some reason, the hosts
>file did not have world read privileges!
>
>Thanks for the assistance - your question led me to further telnet localhost
>25 testing. I'd done it as root and it worked... I hadn't tried it as a
>non
failure at midnight last night).
--Will
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:22 AM
> To: Will Nordmeyer; mailman-users@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection
&g
At 11:54 PM -0400 3/26/07, Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> Any other suggestions - I've got a client who needs to get an email out to
> the list asap.
Did you check your firewall settings, to make sure that connections
to port 25 on the localhost IP address would be accepted?
--
Brad Knowles <[EMAIL
Hi,
I've searched the FAQ, and followed the steps in 3.14, but cannot resolve
this error.
Mar 27 03:35:58 2007 (20228) Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection
refused'), msgid: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm running on a CentOS system, and installed from source.
My netstat - na | grep ":25 "
Patrick Franz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> thank you for your help, it's finally working.
>
> I changed the local_interfaces to "local_interfaces = 0.0.0.0" and
> changed the SMTPHOST to 130.83.2.184.
If you simply comment out the local_interfaces line in exim.conf
(0.0.0.0 is the default), you will
Hi all,
thank you for your help, it's finally working.
I changed the local_interfaces to "local_interfaces = 0.0.0.0" and
changed the SMTPHOST to 130.83.2.184.
=== =
/#/\#\ /#/\#\
/#/ \#\ /#/ \#\
/#/ patrick \#\
/#/ @ \#\
/#/malkin.de
Paul Tomblin wrote:
> Quoting Patrick Franz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 18:38 schrieb Paul Tomblin:
Yes, Exim is running for a year or so and it is working so far.
fb04184:~# telnet localhost 25
Trying 127.0.0.1...
telnet: Unable to connec
Quoting Larry Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Patrick Franz wrote:
> > A netstat -lnp gives:
> >
> > tcp0 0 130.83.2.184:25 0.0.0.0:*
> > LISTEN 21340/exim4
> >
> > with 130.83.2.184 being the server's IP.
>
> I'm no expert but I think just because it's l
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Patrick Franz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 18:38 schrieb Paul Tomblin:
> >
> > > Yes, Exim is running for a year or so and it is working so far.
> > >
> > > fb04184:~# telnet localhost 25
> > > Trying 127.0.0.1...
> > > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host
Quoting Patrick Franz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 18:38 schrieb Paul Tomblin:
> >
> > > Yes, Exim is running for a year or so and it is working so far.
> > >
> > > fb04184:~# telnet localhost 25
> > > Trying 127.0.0.1...
> > > telnet: Unable to connect to remote hos
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 18:38 schrieb Paul Tomblin:
>
> > Yes, Exim is running for a year or so and it is working so far.
> >
> > fb04184:~# telnet localhost 25
> > Trying 127.0.0.1...
> > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
>
> If it's not listening on port 25 on
Quoting Patrick Franz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 18:29 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
> > Your Mailman is unable to connect to your outgoing MTA (Exim). Exim
> > is refusing connection or is not listening on 'localhost' port 25.
> >
> > Can you
> >
> > telnet localhost 25
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 16. Januar 2007 18:29 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
> Your Mailman is unable to connect to your outgoing MTA (Exim). Exim
> is refusing connection or is not listening on 'localhost' port 25.
>
> Can you
>
> telnet localhost 25
>
> on the Mailman/Exim box? Presumably Exim is running if yo
Patrick Franz wrote:
>I can create lists now, I can manage them and I can send mails to those
>lists. Those mails land in the archive as they should, but they don't
>get delivered to the subscribers. A look at
>/var/log/mailman/smtp-failure gives the following:
>
>
>Jan 16 17:12:32 2007 (9353)
Hi,
I'm running a Debian Sarge machine with Exim 4.50 and I recently
installed Mailman 2.1.5. The installation itself went without any
bigger problems.
I can create lists now, I can manage them and I can send mails to those
lists. Those mails land in the archive as they should, but they don't
Meant to send to the whole list, in case anyone's interested...
assign the port to SMTPPORT if it's not 25.
I did that, and it seems to be working now. Thanks very much.
I'm not sure if this would have changed your take on this or not, but I am able
to telnet from the box to the ip and the domain
Andy McHargue wrote:
>
>When logged into the machine, telnet localhost 25 -- results in
>'connection refused' -- uhh, is this a problem?
Yes.
>Since my messages are
>reaching mailman, I'm not sure. If it's a problem, how can I correct.
It has nothing to do with incoming messages reaching Mail
Hi all,
Hoping you can help a newbie with a Mailman install. Using Sendmail.
I can't get Mailman to distribute messages. I see the messages in
~mailman/lists/test3/digest.mbox, so they seem to be reaching the server
OK, just not being sent on. In smtp-failure I'm getting:
Feb 08 16:44:41 2005
At 9:34 PM +0200 2004-09-23, vlado wrote:
Sep 23 21:22:41 2004 (754) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with
code -1: (111, 'Connection refused')
Sep 23 21:22:41 2004 (754) Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection
refused'), msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This looks like an MTA problem -- the mac
Dear friends
I know this topic was already talked on this list but i checked the archive
and did not find the right answer for my problem. I'm running mailman on
Fedora C2 with apache web server. The web works fine. I was able to create
list. After installation i created the mailman list.
When i
36 matches
Mail list logo
