Hello,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 3:03 PM +1100 11/27/06, Guy Waugh quoted Kim Hawtin:
>
>>> How/where do you share the incoming mail list aliases that sendmail checks?
>>>
>>> Also when you create a new list, how to you update the other hosts aliases?
>>>
>> On each server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 7:14 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:10 PM -0600 11/28/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
>
>> Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
>
> Searching the FAQ wizard for "NFS" doesn't turn up any hits, so I
> would venture a guess to say that this issue i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:32 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
> I believe that you are correct -- if the post is held on only one
> server, and you happen to log into the other server to approve the
> post, then the second machine would not see that post to approv
At 6:14 PM -0600 11/28/06, Brad Knowles quoted Gadi Evron:
>> Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
>
> Searching the FAQ wizard for "NFS" doesn't turn up any hits, so I
> would venture a guess to say that this issue is not addressed anywhere.
> I'll summarize Barry's response and put in a link.
Okay
At 6:10 PM -0600 11/28/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
Searching the FAQ wizard for "NFS" doesn't turn up any hits, so I
would venture a guess to say that this issue is not addressed
anywhere. I'll summarize Barry's response and put in a link.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL P
Is this in the FAQ anywhere?
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 6:30 PM -0500 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > Of course, if machine 1 went down, all the messages in its hash
> > slices would sit unprocessed, but it would be a fairly simple matter
> > to reconfigure machine 2 to
At 6:30 PM -0500 11/28/06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Of course, if machine 1 went down, all the messages in its hash
> slices would sit unprocessed, but it would be a fairly simple matter
> to reconfigure machine 2 to handle machine 1's slices, or to bring up
> a fallback machine to handle those s
At 10:08 AM +1100 11/29/06, Guy Waugh wrote:
> I'm still wondering whether I should be NFS-sharing the qfiles
> directory. I haven't delved into the Mailman source code to try to
> figure this out, but...
In theory, it should work. I wouldn't do it myself, because of the
contention and locki
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:08 PM, Guy Waugh wrote:
>
>> I'm still wondering whether I should be NFS-sharing the qfiles
>> directory. I haven't delved into the Mailman source code to try to
>> figure this out, but...
>
> You should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 28, 2006, at 6:08 PM, Guy Waugh wrote:
> I'm still wondering whether I should be NFS-sharing the qfiles
> directory. I haven't delved into the Mailman source code to try to
> figure this out, but...
You should be able to NFS share the qfiles d
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 3:03 PM +1100 11/27/06, Guy Waugh quoted Kim Hawtin:
>
>>> How/where do you share the incoming mail list aliases that sendmail
>>> checks?
>>>
>>> Also when you create a new list, how to you update the other hosts
>>> aliases?
>>>
>> On each server, in the sendmail ali
At 3:03 PM +1100 11/27/06, Guy Waugh quoted Kim Hawtin:
>> How/where do you share the incoming mail list aliases that sendmail checks?
>>
>> Also when you create a new list, how to you update the other hosts aliases?
>>
> On each server, in the sendmail aliases file. So, when adding or
> remov
Guy Waugh wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I run Mailman 2.1.9 on two load-balanced RHEL3 servers. The load
> balancer is an LVS director (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org), a layer
> 4 software load balancer. The load balancer balances requests to
> sendmail on the two RHEL3 servers, and to apache running
Hi Kim, list,
Kim Hawtin wrote:
> Guy Waugh wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I run Mailman 2.1.9 on two load-balanced RHEL3 servers. The load
>> balancer is an LVS director (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org), a layer
>> 4 software load balancer. The load balancer balances requests to
>> sendmail on
Hi there,
I run Mailman 2.1.9 on two load-balanced RHEL3 servers. The load
balancer is an LVS director (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org), a layer
4 software load balancer. The load balancer balances requests to
sendmail on the two RHEL3 servers, and to apache running the Mailman web
interface. B
15 matches
Mail list logo
