Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The anonymous_list is set to "No", and changing it to "Yes" makes posts >in the archive anonymous too (presently, only the emails are anonymous, >not the archive). Changing it back from "Yes" to "No" shows the exact >same behavior as well. This makes me suspect the MTA

Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous

2008-06-17 Thread david . weber
Original Message- > From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:42 PM > To: Weber, David C @ Link; Brad Knowles > Cc: mailman-users@python.org > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous

2008-06-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This doesn't seem to be the behavior that we're seeing. It seemingly >happened out of the blue, and we can create a new mailing list which >behaves as it did before. The headers also do not contain From XXX on >Behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original user is being obs

Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous

2008-06-17 Thread david . weber
he headers altogether. > -Original Message- > From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:41 AM > To: Weber, David C @ Link > Cc: mailman-users@python.org > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous > > [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous

2008-06-17 Thread Brad Knowles
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We saw some weird behavior on one of our lists about a month ago. It's an internal list, and is meant to not be anonymous. All of a sudden, the messages are coming from our -bounces address, and the users are being obscured. See FAQ 2.3 at

[Mailman-Users] List suddenly went anonymous

2008-06-17 Thread david . weber
All, We saw some weird behavior on one of our lists about a month ago. It's an internal list, and is meant to not be anonymous. All of a sudden, the messages are coming from our -bounces address, and the users are being obscured. If you look at the archive, the names are being stored correctly,