BDY.RTF
Description: RTF file
> Jim Kutter wrote:
>
> > Also - as far as stats go, in the smtp log, is that a fair
> > count for how many messages really got sent?
For what purpose do you need this count? I.e. do you want to bill
a customer for the number of email messages that are sent out
from his account?
Or do you want
On Tue, 02 Oct 2001 14:14:03 -0700
arandall wrote:
> Was ist VERP?
VERP == Variable Envelope Return Paths
Original definition and implementation can be found here:
http://cr.yp.to/proto/verp.txt
> That's good enough to track trends and make the marketing weenies
> happy.
Certainly goo
Was ist VERP?
Like I said, I've moved away from Mailman for my announce-only
newsletter type lists, so it won't really help Mailman users to hear
this, but just in case anyone's interested With regards to bounce
numbers, we've developed a "pitchfork" approach (it has several prongs
with which
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001 15:06:34 -0400
Jon Carnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hate to say this, as I totally despise spam but... to get a
> truly accurate count of folks who really open or at least preview
> the message, send the message as html and include a link to a tiny
> gif on one of your w
On Tue, 02 Oct 2001 12:08:51 -0700
arandall wrote:
> Jim Kutter wrote:
>> That brings me to another question - what's an accurate method of
>> counting the number of bounces? I was grepping the bounce log and
>> counting the number of bounces for my newsletter. That will only
>> work however i
eir ISP or firewall). Anyway, marketing guys go bonkers
over this kind of stuff.
Enjoy.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Kutter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Amanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:30 PM
Sub
Jim Kutter wrote:
> That brings me to another question - what's an accurate method of counting the
>number of bounces? I was grepping the bounce log and counting the number of bounces
>for my newsletter. That will only work however if I wipe the bounce log every few
>days - and even then I won
Greg Ward wrote:
> On 02 October 2001, Amanda said:
>
> > Quick and dirty answer - you could set your Reply-To to some other
> > location.
>
> Not quite -- a correctly-configured auto-responder (apparently they do
> exist) will reply to the envelope sender, or the address in the "From"
> or "Send
AIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Limited posting
> This sounds familiar! Only we get ~1800 per edition of newsletter... doctors really
>love their "Your message has been received" and "I'
On 02 October 2001, Amanda said:
> Quick and dirty answer - you could set your Reply-To to some other
> location.
Not quite -- a correctly-configured auto-responder (apparently they do
exist) will reply to the envelope sender, or the address in the "From"
or "Sender" headers if it doesn't know t
> Hello again folks. You've all been tremendous help for me recently, but I
have a another question.
>
> I am using mailman to manage a newsletter list (with some other lists -
but that's the primary use), and obviously I don't want to allow public
postings to a newsletter. So I set the e-mail ad
This sounds familiar! Only we get ~1800 per edition of newsletter... doctors really
love their "Your message has been received" and "I'm out of the office today" vacation
settings. :-)
Quick and dirty answer - you could set your Reply-To to some other location. That will
of course direct not o
Hello again folks. You've all been tremendous help for me recently, but I have a
another question.
I am using mailman to manage a newsletter list (with some other lists - but that's the
primary use), and obviously I don't want to allow public postings to a newsletter. So
I set the e-mail addre
14 matches
Mail list logo
