Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-22 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 11:39:37AM -0600, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 10:01 AM -0500 2005-12-22, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Ahh. In this case you might want to give me some identifying > information for your lists, because I updated FAQ 1.15 with the > information you had posted on the list, an

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-22 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:01 AM -0500 2005-12-22, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > I knew things were going to sound like this when I came to the list, > and I do apologize. I agree 100%. The issue here is that the server > houses lists for a fairly high-profile television celebrity. You might > be suprised at the amo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-22 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > At 10:46 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > I'm working on the web developer to implement some better checks. It'd > be awesome if when we got a subscription request from a client, some code > made sure they didn't type [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-22 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 01:23:12AM -0600, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 10:46 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > One propety of these lists is that there is a high incidence of bad > > addresses - the developer of the web front end refuses to do any kind > > of validation before they are ad

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-22 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:26:50PM -0600, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 5:40 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > > > I've got some questions on a mailman server that's currently > > performing non-optimally. > > If you've got a large list, the first thing you need to do is to > search

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-21 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:46 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Another question. Most of the time VirginRunner is at max CPU, > sending address removal notifications. I have already set the lists > to zero bounce notifications. Is there a separate config item for > "you have been removed" messages?

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-21 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:40 PM -0500 2005-12-21, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > I've got some questions on a mailman server that's currently > performing non-optimally. If you've got a large list, the first thing you need to do is to search the FAQ and the archives for the words "performance" and "large". >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-21 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ross Vandegrift wrote: > >Another question. Most of the time VirginRunner is at max CPU, >sending address removal notifications. I have already set the lists >to zero bounce notifications. Is there a separate config item for >"you have been removed" messages? There's no config setting for this.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-21 Thread Ross Vandegrift
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 05:40:31PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > The server has four lists of about 200,000 recipients each. They are > announce-only subscription lists that receive an occasional post. > Despite being low traffic, we have some consistency issues. Another question. Most of the

[Mailman-Users] Large mailing lists

2005-12-21 Thread Ross Vandegrift
Hello everyone, I've got some questions on a mailman server that's currently performing non-optimally. The server has four lists of about 200,000 recipients each. They are announce-only subscription lists that receive an occasional post. Despite being low traffic, we have some consistency issues