Re: [Mailman-Users] Internet Service Providers and Spam

2006-05-14 Thread Phil usps
ot;Phil usps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Users List Mailman" Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Internet Service Providers and Spam > At 9:08 AM -0400 2006-05-09, Phil usps wrote: > >> We are in the middle of a contest with a very lar

Re: [Mailman-Users] Internet Service Providers and Spam

2006-05-09 Thread Brad Knowles
At 9:08 AM -0400 2006-05-09, Phil usps wrote: > We are in the middle of a contest with a very large, popular, and > well-established ISP, who insists on declaring as spam, any message sent to > more than 100 of its customers. Since it is "spam", it is automatically > bounced, and hundreds of o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Internet Service Providers and Spam

2006-05-09 Thread Richard Barrett
On 9 May 2006, at 14:08, Phil usps wrote: > We are in the middle of a contest with a very large, popular, and > well-established ISP, who insists on declaring as spam, any message > sent to > more than 100 of its customers. Since it is "spam", it is > automatically > bounced, and hundreds of

[Mailman-Users] Internet Service Providers and Spam

2006-05-09 Thread Phil usps
We are in the middle of a contest with a very large, popular, and well-established ISP, who insists on declaring as spam, any message sent to more than 100 of its customers. Since it is "spam", it is automatically bounced, and hundreds of our list members not only do not receive the message, the Ma