Mark Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in reply:
>Yes, the "%(listname)s" bit is fine when there is something in the
>archive. It's weird that it gets malformed (i.e the missing slash) when
>the archive is empty.
>
>I tried some edits on "emptyarchive.html" file and restarted Mailman,
>but these e
Mark Dale wrote:
>
>Yes, the "%(listname)s" bit is fine when there is something in the
>archive. It's weird that it gets malformed (i.e the missing slash) when
>the archive is empty.
>
>I tried some edits on "emptyarchive.html" file and restarted Mailman,
>but these edits didn't show up - so doe
Yes, the "%(listname)s" bit is fine when there is something in the
archive. It's weird that it gets malformed (i.e the missing slash) when
the archive is empty.
I tried some edits on "emptyarchive.html" file and restarted Mailman,
but these edits didn't show up - so does that mean the empty ar
Mark Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On the Archives page, when the archives are empty, Mailman displays the
>following message (which is correct).
>
>"No messages have been posted to this list yet, so the archives are
>currently empty. You can get ."
>
>
>However, there is an error with the "m
Mark Dale wrote:
>
>On the Archives page, when the archives are empty, Mailman displays the
>following message (which is correct).
>
>"No messages have been posted to this list yet, so the archives are
>currently empty. You can get ."
>
>
>However, there is an error with the "more info" link - a
On the Archives page, when the archives are empty, Mailman displays the
following message (which is correct).
"No messages have been posted to this list yet, so the archives are
currently empty. You can get ."
However, there is an error with the "more info" link - a slash is
missing between
