Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ivan Van Laningham wrote: >Mark writes: >> > >> >The address is supposed to be "ryunyo at earthlink.net". >> >> >> No, it is supposed to be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". >> > >Not exactly. On the index pages for the archives, index lines take >one of two forms: > ># [Sangha] Welcome Home mag at swcp.com

Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-20 Thread Ivan Van Laningham
Hi All-- On 4/20/07, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 2:05 PM -0600 4/20/07, Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > > The .txt files are the text version of the "cooked" archives. They > are not in "raw" mbox format. The format is close to that of a "raw" > mbox, and it wouldn't take too much w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-20 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:05 PM -0600 4/20/07, Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > Nowhere are @ signs supposed to be used in the archives. Or at least > in the version of Mailman I'm using and the way I've got it set up. The .txt files are the text version of the "cooked" archives. They are not in "raw" mbox format. T

Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-20 Thread Ivan Van Laningham
Hi All-- Mark writes: > > > > >[Sangha] Anger and its expression Ryunyokingryunyo at earthlink.net > > > >The address is supposed to be "ryunyo at earthlink.net". > > > No, it is supposed to be "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > Not exactly. On the index pages for the archives, index lines take one of two

Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-20 Thread Mark Sapiro
Ivan Van Laningham wrote: >Hi All-- >This is very helpful. What I have are basically three sets of archives. > >1) Archives from the current list, fairly small and created about two >months ago after a disastrous ISP debacle (the yo-yos got themselves >_evicted_, for heaven's sake); > >2) Archi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-19 Thread Mark Sapiro
Brad Knowles wrote: >At 10:53 AM -0600 4/19/07, Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > >> There's a FAQ entry on importing archives. However, if the >> instructions are followed, the existing list.mbox would be overwritten >> with an old archive. > >No, I don't think so. It just reads from the specified

Re: [Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-19 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:53 AM -0600 4/19/07, Ivan Van Laningham wrote: > There's a FAQ entry on importing archives. However, if the > instructions are followed, the existing list.mbox would be overwritten > with an old archive. No, I don't think so. It just reads from the specified mbox file, or from the def

[Mailman-Users] Importing archives again

2007-04-19 Thread Ivan Van Laningham
Hi All-- There's a FAQ entry on importing archives. However, if the instructions are followed, the existing list.mbox would be overwritten with an old archive. That surely cannot be right. Can I put it someplace else in order to import it? Shouldn't I lock the list while running bin/arch? I've