Sorry for wrong threading but I accidentally deleted the last email
here:
> One reason is that the server may very well translate the encoding
> based on negotiation with the client. (I guess you could argue that
Yes, but *if* the encoding is negotatied, a default value makes not that
much sense
> "Bernd" == Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Content-Type: header specifying charset=utf-8. For reasons I
>> don't understand, the HTML standard says the server provided
>> Content-Type: charset takes priority over that specified by an
>> HTML META tag.
Be
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 14:05 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> >I actually reported a bug (though it may not sound so): I enter
> >(apparently) UTF-8 text (with Firefox it that is important) and it comes
> >back disguised (and as part of) ISO-8859-1 text.
> >The question is: Whi
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>
>I actually reported a bug (though it may not sound so): I enter
>(apparently) UTF-8 text (with Firefox it that is important) and it comes
>back disguised (and as part of) ISO-8859-1 text.
>The question is: Which part is doing something wrong and how to fix it?
What happ
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 09:52 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
[...]
> As Brad points out in another reply, some of this problem is because
> all text entered in the web interface (except for General
> Options->info which is a special case) is HTML escaped to prevent XSS
> attacks. Mailman arguably goes ove
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>
>The problem is that I enter text in the web-interface on a default UTF-8
>system and it is apparently stored as UTF-8. The pages are delivered as
>ISO-8859-1 according to the HTTP header and the header in the file.
>So the CGI scripts actually should convert correctly t
At 1:04 PM +0200 2005-10-24, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> The other solution is to use รถ and brothers and blame the ML admin
> if he doesn't do so (and put in somwhere into the docs or so).
>
> There is BTW a similar problem: If I enter " (quotes) in the web
> interface, they are converted to "
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:52 +0200, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
[...]
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:58:37PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> >Apparently all of the German translation of Mailman is in ISO-8859-1 (or
> >ISO-8859-15) - at least in the standard Debian mailman package.
>
> >Is there a speci
Hello!
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:58:37PM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>Apparently all of the German translation of Mailman is in ISO-8859-1 (or
>ISO-8859-15) - at least in the standard Debian mailman package.
>Is there a special reason for not moving to UTF-8 in general?
I'd say: YAGNI (Ya a
Apparently all of the German translation of Mailman is in ISO-8859-1 (or
ISO-8859-15) - at least in the standard Debian mailman package.
Is there a special reason for not moving to UTF-8 in general?
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416
10 matches
Mail list logo
