Geoff Shang wrote:
>
>You can set the archive to be either public, viewable to members ownly, or
>viewable only by the list admins.
I think you are confusing the list archives with the roster (membership
list). The roster can be set to be viewable by anyone, by members and
admins or by admins on
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Dave Pawson wrote:
I'm getting complaints with the 'at' form Mark.
If the archive is set to private, is it still created,
just visible to the list admin?
You can set the archive to be either public, viewable to members ownly, or
viewable only by the list admins.
Geoff.
Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>I'm getting complaints with the 'at' form Mark.
>If the archive is set to private, is it still created,
>just visible to the list admin?
If the archive is private, it is created just the same, but it is only
accessible via the 'private' CGI URL and requires login with either
On 22 September 2010 15:52, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> If ARCHIVER_OBSCURES_EMAILADDRS = Yes (the default), the address is
> mildly obscured ('@' is changed to ' at ' not only here, but in the
> message bodies too), and the mailto: link behind it is to the list,
> not to the sender.
>
> If this is not
Dave Pawson wrote:
>In the archive view the second line is the sender, name and email address.
>
>Is it possible to block this/ hide the email address please?
>I'm getting complaints that people won't use the list
>because of spam risks?
If ARCHIVER_OBSCURES_EMAILADDRS = Yes (the default), the a
In the archive view the second line is the sender, name and email address.
Is it possible to block this/ hide the email address please?
I'm getting complaints that people won't use the list
because of spam risks?
TIA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
---
