At 10:08 AM -0500 10/9/06, Patrick Bogen wrote:
> Not trying to be rude;
Of course.
> it just seemed to me that for security issues
> in the code (rather than, say, conceptual security issues), the
> appropriate place to start would be mailman-developers- and the list
On 10/9/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/06, Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 2:08 PM -0500 10/8/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
> >
> > >> > Just thought I'd share. If mailman is in need of volunteers, please
> > >> let us
> > >> > know.
> >
> > >>
> > >> Also, the pr
At 2:08 PM -0500 10/8/06, Gadi Evron wrote:
>> > Just thought I'd share. If mailman is in need of volunteers, please let us
>> > know.
>>
>> Also, the proper place for your message would probably be
>> mailman-developers, rather than mailman-users.
>
> Thanks. I'm a user though, and thought
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Patrick Bogen wrote:
> On 10/8/06, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I searched for TBD and then TBD security. The very first hit is from
> > mailman 2.0.9:
> > * TBD: This file needs a security audit.
> 2.0.9? Mailman is currently 2.1.9. I'm not sure if this s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 8, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> Hi guys. I've been playing a lot with Google's new code search,
> collecting
> a lot of search strings relating to security.
>
> I searched for TBD and then TBD security. The very first hit is from
>
On 10/8/06, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I searched for TBD and then TBD security. The very first hit is from
> mailman 2.0.9:
> * TBD: This file needs a security audit.
2.0.9? Mailman is currently 2.1.9. I'm not sure if this still applies.
> Just thought I'd share. If mailman
Hi guys. I've been playing a lot with Google's new code search, collecting
a lot of search strings relating to security.
I searched for TBD and then TBD security. The very first hit is from
mailman 2.0.9:
38: *
* TBD: This file needs a security audit.
*/
Just thought I'
