[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman condemns reinstatement of RMS

2021-04-12 Thread Abhilash Raj
To the Mailman community, The GNU Mailman Steering Committee condemns the reinstatement of Richard M. Stallman (RMS) to the Board of the Free Software Foundation (FSF), and has taken the following actions: 1. On behalf of the GNU Mailman project, signed the letter on GitHub[1] calling for the

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman sprinting at Pycon 2014

2014-02-24 Thread Barry Warsaw
Hello sprinters! Once again, the GNU Mailman project will be sprinting at Pycon, this time the 2014 conference in Montreal. I've created a placeholder page for adding ideas about what you would like to work on, as well as our priorities. We'll be filling out details over the next few weeks, but

Re: [Mailman-Users] gnu Mailman Configuration

2013-04-06 Thread Mark Sapiro
Doug Walker wrote: > >I would like to add this additional verbiage below that: > >machi1964 Web Site >http://machi1964.com >Login: Email User User name (example: doug4r) >Password: gogrizzlies > >How do I do this? Go to the list's web admin interface -> Non-digest options. Add your text to msg_f

[Mailman-Users] gnu Mailman Configuration

2013-04-05 Thread Doug Walker
The verbiage: Machi1964 mailing list machi1...@list.machi1964.com http://list.machi1964.com/mailman/listinfo/machi1964_list.machi1964.com is appended to each piece of mail sent by gnu Mailman. I would like to add this additional verbiage below that: machi1964 Web Site http://machi1964.com Login

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman, admins and passwords

2012-10-08 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > Do you understand what I'm saying above? > > I am not saying that you should not set your subscription to "no mail". > I am saying that if you make this choice, you should not place the > burden of this choice upon others by asking them to Cc you on replies. > You shou

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman, admins and passwords

2012-10-08 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 10/8/2012 7:45 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote: > in-line :- > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> Then you should read the list archives on the web to see your post and >> any replies. Some people Cc the poster routinely for various reasons, >> and some do not, but you don't ne

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman, admins and passwords

2012-10-08 Thread shirish शिरीष
in-line :- On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 10/5/2012 1:04 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote: >> >> Secondly, please CC >> me if somebody answers to this query as I have stopped mail delivery >> from the list. > > > Then you should read the list archives on the web to see your post a

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman, admins and passwords

2012-10-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 10/5/2012 1:04 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote: > > Secondly, please CC > me if somebody answers to this query as I have stopped mail delivery > from the list. Then you should read the list archives on the web to see your post and any replies. Some people Cc the poster routinely for various reasons, a

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman, admins and passwords

2012-10-06 Thread shirish शिरीष
Hi all, Newbie on the list. First of all thank you for making GNU Mailman and making prospective mods. and admins life easier. Secondly, please CC me if somebody answers to this query as I have stopped mail delivery from the list (Mailman can simply deluge my inbox as it has quite some activity) a

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman sprint at Pycon 2012

2012-01-25 Thread Barry Warsaw
Hey folks, it looks like we're going to have a quorum of core developers at Pycon 2012 in Santa Clara, so we will definitely be sprinting on Mailman 3. We'll be primarily working on the integration of the core engine with the official Django-based web ui. If you want to participate, kibbitz, or ju

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman in the 2011 Google Summer of Code

2011-03-28 Thread Barry Warsaw
Hi everyone, We're going to be participating in the Google Summer of Code again this year, but this time, under the Python Software Foundation's banner. Here's our wiki page for GSoC ideas, mentors, and students: http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/Google+Summer+of+Code+2011 and the PSF page with

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman 3 alpha 5

2010-01-20 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Clare Redstone writes: > I don't know enough about how new releases are named. Does alpha mean this > Mailman 3 is now ready for general use? Should I ask my host provider to > move us to it? I'm a bog-standard user so not ready for something that is > still going through early tests and doesn

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman 3 alpha 5

2010-01-20 Thread Terri Oda
The short answer is no, you do not want to ask for an upgrade yet. An alpha release is an early one, prior to the product being ready for all users. Wikipedia has a reasonable page explaining how software releases are often named: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_release Terri Clare Red

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman 3 alpha 5

2010-01-20 Thread Clare Redstone
Hi, I don't know enough about how new releases are named. Does alpha mean this Mailman 3 is now ready for general use? Should I ask my host provider to move us to it? I'm a bog-standard user so not ready for something that is still going through early tests and doesn't have everything set up ye

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman roadmap

2009-11-01 Thread Stefan Förster
* Barry Warsaw : [...] > Here's the plan: Mark is going to put a 2.1.13 bug fix release out soon > and will continue to fix only the most important bugs on the 2.1 branch. > He'll forward port those fixes to the 2.2 branch for the few people who > are running it from source, but there will never be

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman roadmap

2009-11-01 Thread Barry Warsaw
As you know, Mailman 2.1 has long been in maintenance-only mode. Mailman 2.2 was where we were going to add new features and update the user interface, without changing the basic model. Mailman 3 was where we were going to fix the model and modernize the architecture to allow for better e

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman Upgrade

2006-10-17 Thread Bryan Carbonnell
On 10/17/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/17/06, Kaushal Shriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have compiled GNU Mailman version 2.1.8 from source from > > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/mailman/ > > All you need to do, then, is run 'configure' with the same options you > gave it the

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman Upgrade

2006-10-17 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 10/17/06, Kaushal Shriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have compiled GNU Mailman version 2.1.8 from source from > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/mailman/ All you need to do, then, is run 'configure' with the same options you gave it the first time, then compile and install normally. The new sources f

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman Upgrade

2006-10-17 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
On 10/17/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/17/06, Kaushal Shriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have GNU Mailman version is 2.1.8 running on my linux box, Just > > wanted to know "How do i upgrade it to "The current stable GNU Mailman > > version is 2.1.9, released on 12-Sep-2

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman Upgrade

2006-10-17 Thread Patrick Bogen
On 10/17/06, Kaushal Shriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have GNU Mailman version is 2.1.8 running on my linux box, Just > wanted to know "How do i upgrade it to "The current stable GNU Mailman > version is 2.1.9, released on 12-Sep-2006" Did you compile your Mailman from source, or are you usi

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman Upgrade

2006-10-16 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
Hi ALL I have GNU Mailman version is 2.1.8 running on my linux box, Just wanted to know "How do i upgrade it to "The current stable GNU Mailman version is 2.1.9, released on 12-Sep-2006" Thanks and Regards Kaushal -- Mailman-Users mailing list

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman

2006-06-12 Thread Terry Allen
>Hi ALL > >I am a newbie to install GNU Mailman, I have downloaded mailman-2.1.8.tgz >Just wanted to know the step by step guide to install Mailman > >Thank You > >Regards > Hi again, The instructions are included in the document named Intsall within the archive you downloaded, but there a

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman

2006-06-12 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
Hi ALL I am a newbie to install GNU Mailman, I have downloaded mailman-2.1.8.tgz Just wanted to know the step by step guide to install Mailman Thank You Regards Kaushal -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.

Re: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman & MS Exchange

2004-06-08 Thread Brad Knowles
At 3:53 PM +1000 2004-06-06, JOHN O'REILLY wrote: I have checked the GNU Mailman FAQ and see no mention of whether or not GNU Mailman will work with MS EXchange. The question is has anyone tried any level of 'integration' with these two products. See

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman & MS Exchange

2004-06-07 Thread JOHN O'REILLY
Hello Folks, I have checked the GNU Mailman FAQ and see no mention of whether or not GNU Mailman will work with MS EXchange. The question is has anyone tried any level of 'integration' with these two products. Thanks \\\

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman on an Ensim

2002-03-19 Thread Clark E. Morgan
I've got a relatively new Ensim Webppliance machine via RackShack and have been givng some thought to installing Mailman as I had on a RaQ from another, heretofore to remain nameless, provider. I figure inside the chrooted sites would be a great way to run it, removing the limitation on duplicate

Attn: Brian Teal RE: [Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman on an Ensim

2002-03-18 Thread Clark E. Morgan
Brian, Yes, even a glimmer of hope is good. I was hoping not to run it from root; but there it is.if your installing fiend doesn't mind; could you forward some contact info. Perhaps he/she could be of some help. Thanks. Clark E. Morgan > From: Brian Teal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I have do

[Mailman-Users] GNU Mailman on an Ensim

2002-03-18 Thread Clark E. Morgan
I've got a relatively new Ensim Webppliance machine via RackShack and have been givng some thought to installing Mailman as I had on a RaQ from another, heretofore to remain nameless, provider. I figure inside the chrooted sites would be a great way to run it, removing the limitation on duplicate