Re: [Mailman-Users] Formatting incoming mail in Mailman

2010-02-13 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Mark Sapiro writes: > multipart/related > multipart/alternative > text/plain > text/html > image/xxx > > which are produced by some Microsoft MUAs and possibly others. If you > don't pass multipart/related, that entire message will be filtered. If > you do pass al

Re: [Mailman-Users] Formatting incoming mail in Mailman

2010-02-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
Hank van Cleef wrote: >The esteemed Mark Sapiro has said: >> >> Presumably you are using pass_mime_types to remove the 'non-matching' >> types. What's in pass_mime_types? > >(copied from the options page): >mixed >alternative >text/plain >text/html The above is not correct. If you have a single

Re: [Mailman-Users] Formatting incoming mail in Mailman

2010-02-13 Thread Hank van Cleef
The esteemed Mark Sapiro has said: > > Hank van Cleef wrote: > > >I just sent a message to my list from a webmail account, and got an > >empty text body in what was sent out from the list. Sent a second > >message to a user account which I read with elm to see what's in > >the message body. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Formatting incoming mail in Mailman

2010-02-13 Thread Mark Sapiro
Hank van Cleef wrote: >I just sent a message to my list from a webmail account, and got an >empty text body in what was sent out from the list. Sent a second >message to a user account which I read with elm to see what's in >the message body. > >This is all of what comes through sendmail into

[Mailman-Users] Formatting incoming mail in Mailman

2010-02-13 Thread Hank van Cleef
I just sent a message to my list from a webmail account, and got an empty text body in what was sent out from the list. Sent a second message to a user account which I read with elm to see what's in the message body. This is all of what comes through sendmail into the mbox: send a line or t