- Original Message -
From: "John Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Short of that the only other things I can think of would be to strace
> (assuming you're on a system with strace, e.g. Linux) the postfix
> process and seeing where the failure occurs and/or to look at the
> postfix code that
- Original Message -
From: "John Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:00 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
>
> O.K. the other things I suggested you check all seem fine.
>
>> > Is mailman in /etc/shadow on the machine
>> > postfix is running on?
>>
>> grep mailman /etc/shadow
>>
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:00 -0700, Bill Landry wrote:
O.K. the other things I suggested you check all seem fine.
> > Is mailman in /etc/shadow on the machine
> > postfix is running on?
>
> grep mailman /etc/shadow
> mailman:!!:12327::
Actually /etc/passwd maybe more relevant in this instanc
- Original Message -
From: "John Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:48 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> And did that say anything about a group mismatch error? Or is there
>> anything in Mailman's 'error' log?
>>
>> If you're getting group mismatch errors, see FAQ article
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:48 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> And did that say anything about a group mismatch error? Or is there
> anything in Mailman's 'error' log?
>
> If you're getting group mismatch errors, see FAQ article 6.16
FWIW, I don't think this problem will manifest itself as a mailman gro
- Original Message -
From: "John Dennis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 11:46 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Bill Landry wrote:
>> >
>> >Jun 6 10:52:07 lists postfix/local[20108]: warning: cannot find alias
>> >database owner for hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases(0,34100)
Bill Landry wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> What happens if you leave the ownership as root:mailman in spite of
>> check_perms?
>
>Then I get the following in the maillog:
>
>Jun 6 12:22:45 lists postfix/local[20474]: 711426FE2C:
>to=<[EMAIL PR
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 11:46 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Bill Landry wrote:
> >
> >Jun 6 10:52:07 lists postfix/local[20108]: warning: cannot find alias
> >database owner for hash:/usr/local/mailman/data/aliases(0,34100)
> In any case, this appears to be a postfix configuration issue. A google
>
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What happens if you leave the ownership as root:mailman in spite of
> check_perms?
Then I get the following in the maillog:
Jun 6 12:22:45 lists postfix/local[20474]: 711426FE2C:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=local, delay=
Bill Landry wrote:
>
>I change the aliases.db to be group writeable, and even tried setting the
>ownership to root:mailman, but "bin/check_perms" did not like that and set
>the permission back to mailman:mailman. The aliase* files now look like
>(with no bin/check_perms issues reported):
>
>-rw
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I have setup a list server running on Fedora Core 2, with Postfix 2.2.3,
> >Mailman 2.1.5, and Python 2.3.4. I think I followed the Mailman setup
> >and
> >configuration guidelines correctly, but am having a problem that I
Bill Landry wrote:
>
>I have setup a list server running on Fedora Core 2, with Postfix 2.2.3,
>Mailman 2.1.5, and Python 2.3.4. I think I followed the Mailman setup and
>configuration guidelines correctly, but am having a problem that I cannot
>find resolution to via google nor by a search of
Hello list members!
I have setup a list server running on Fedora Core 2, with Postfix 2.2.3,
Mailman 2.1.5, and Python 2.3.4. I think I followed the Mailman setup and
configuration guidelines correctly, but am having a problem that I cannot
find resolution to via google nor by a search of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
