Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-19 Thread Barry Finkel
>> I think you're misinterpreting that post. I think she is saying her >> problem was caused by a footer which consisted of only a blank line >> and when she removed the footer completely, the problem went away. >That's not hard for me to believe (that I'm misinterpretting, I mean). Maybe the foo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Sapiro wrote: > As far as it being worth it to upgrade to 2.1.6, there are a few > security issues in 2.1.5 that are fixed in 2.1.6, so yes, I think > it's worth it, but I would suggest trying to go all the way to 2.1.8 > if possible. But none of

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Steve Campbell wrote: Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> Are you saying that the original posts to the list contain attachments >> that go to the list? If so, the list header and footer will always be >> added as separate MIME parts (attachments). > >Exactly, yes that is correct. > >So there is no way, othe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Campbell wrote: > BTW, I did find an RPM, but don't know it validity from: > > http://www.wesmo.com/rpm2html/x86/mailman-2.1.6-1.i386.html > > Is it worth the effort to upgrade from 2.1.5 to 2.1.6? I'd also > really like to stay in the RPM arena

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Steve Campbell
- Original Message - From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steve Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:40 PM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment > Steve Campbell wrote: >> >>I'm

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Steve Campbell wrote: > >I'm still not finished testing, but I did get the sender to receive the >header, body, and footer all in one message. He forgot to add the >attachment. So the test was a little inconclusive. Are you saying that the original posts to the list contain attachments that go

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Steve Campbell
- Original Message - From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steve Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:38 AM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment > Steve Campbell wrote: > >>I have set u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Steve Campbell wrote: >I have set up a list that is used for announcements only. There is a list of >members, but only a few can post. No digests, just immediate delivery. We >have a mixed bag of recipient MUAs here, and although OE receives the mail >normally, Outlook users receive email with

[Mailman-Users] Everything is an attachment

2006-05-17 Thread Steve Campbell
I have set up a list that is used for announcements only. There is a list of members, but only a few can post. No digests, just immediate delivery. We have a mixed bag of recipient MUAs here, and although OE receives the mail normally, Outlook users receive email with the header only in the body