On 5/25/17 7:50 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> It turns out there was a bug in the new member_verbosity_threshold
>> feature such that if the threshold was set to 1, every post would be
>> held and set the members mod flag. The bug report is at
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:30 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 5/18/17 7:53 AM, dwardell at mifnet.com wrote:
>>
>> Recently I enabled "Emergency Moderation" briefly, but when I disabled
>> it the system doesn't return to the normal state--all traffic is still
>> moderated even though EM is off.
>>
>> W
On 5/18/17 7:53 AM, dwardell at mifnet.com wrote:
>
> Recently I enabled "Emergency Moderation" briefly, but when I disabled
> it the system doesn't return to the normal state--all traffic is still
> moderated even though EM is off.
>
> When reviewing posts that are awaiting approval, the option to
On 5/18/17 7:53 AM, dward...@mifnet.com wrote:
>
> Recently I enabled "Emergency Moderation" briefly, but when I disabled it the
> system doesn't return to the normal state--all traffic is still moderated
> even though EM is off.
>
> When reviewing posts that are awaiting approval, the option
All,
I've been a happy mailman user for over 10 years and haven't had to trouble
this list until now. Hopefully this isn't an obvious question. I've looked
through the list archive as much as I can and don't see that it's been
previously discussed.
Recently I enabled "Emergency Moderation" br
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Sapiro"
> On December 18, 2014 12:02:24 PM PST, "Xie, Wei"
> wrote:
> >We have one customer to set " Emergency moderation of all list
> >traffic" to 'Yes', all posted messages are really held, but owners do not
> >receive moderation notices. Is this nor
On December 18, 2014 12:02:24 PM PST, "Xie, Wei" wrote:
>
>We have one customer to set " Emergency moderation of all list traffic"
>to 'Yes', all posted messages are really held, but owners do not
>receive moderation notices. Is this normal?
Yes. This is deliberate. It is felt that in an emerge
Mark,
When Emergency moderation of all list traffic is set to 'Yes', all posted
messages should be held for moderation. Should moderation notices be sent to
all owners for moderation?
We have one customer to set " Emergency moderation of all list traffic" to
'Yes', all posted messages are rea
Rob wrote:
>
>So, if I do use Emergency moderate in the future, would I just check the
>pending requests page manually to see if posts have arrived?
If you wanted to know what was waiting moderation before receiving your
daily notice, yes.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
S
On Feb 1, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Rob wrote:
>>
>> I noticed a strange behavior recently. One list was set to "Emergency
>> Moderate" all traffic. For this one list, I (as administrator) did not
>> receive the customary notification of held e-mails until the following day,
>> w
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:05:31 -, Rob wrote:
I am trying to understand this behavior and was curious if anyone had
any thoughts.
I saw exactly the same behaviour a month or two back, then I read the
manual that confirmed this is as intended - to avoid the moderator getting
floods of em
Rob wrote:
>
>I noticed a strange behavior recently. One list was set to "Emergency
>Moderate" all traffic. For this one list, I (as administrator) did not receive
>the customary notification of held e-mails until the following day, when the
>daily reminder message would notify me that the messa
I am running v2.1.13 on Mac OS X Server 10.5.8; all works well, I have many
lists running with virtual hosts for several organizations.
I noticed a strange behavior recently. One list was set to "Emergency Moderate"
all traffic. For this one list, I (as administrator) did not receive the
custom
David Lee wrote:
>
>If the inbound email contains not only the plain text message but also its
> equivalent in HTML
>and if the "Approved:" is specified as the first line of the body rather
> than as a header
>then
> the password is in danger of leaking outbound, being stripped only fro
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
> >
> >You mean that if people used the Approve: header that Mailman doesn't
> >strip it out before it sends it? That seems like a huge security hole.
>
>
> No I don't mean that. It is removed whether or not the password is
> valid. Wh
Larry Stone wrote:
>
>But it also minimizes the risk of accidental disclosure of the site
>password. I assume if Approved was misspelled in a header or as the first
>line of the message, it would be included in the message if it was
>susequently approved by a moderator or met other critieria for no
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
> >
> >You mean that if people used the Approve: header that Mailman doesn't
> >strip it out before it sends it? That seems like a huge security hole.
>
> No I don't mean that. It is removed whether or not the password is
> valid. When
Quoting Paul Tomblin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> My wife is asking what she needs to do with all my servers if i'm
> incapacitated or dead. One of the things that would need to be turned over
> to somebody else are all my mailman lists. And so one thing i'm looking at
> would be a way to send an a
Quoting Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
> >
> >You mean that if people used the Approve: header that Mailman doesn't
> >strip it out before it sends it? That seems like a huge security hole.
>
>
> No I don't mean that. It is removed whether or not the password is
> valid.
Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
>You mean that if people used the Approve: header that Mailman doesn't
>strip it out before it sends it? That seems like a huge security hole.
No I don't mean that. It is removed whether or not the password is
valid. When I said "This is intentional to discourage sending th
Quoting Mark Sapiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Paul Tomblin wrote:
>
> >And so one thing i'm looking at
> >would be a way to send an announcement to all the lists on my server. I
> >understand that you can send mail to a list with an x-approved with the
> >list password, but can you do the same w
Paul Tomblin wrote:
>And so one thing i'm looking at
>would be a way to send an announcement to all the lists on my server. I
>understand that you can send mail to a list with an x-approved with the
>list password, but can you do the same with the admin password?
If by admin password, you m
My wife is asking what she needs to do with all my servers if i'm
incapacitated or dead. One of the things that would need to be turned over
to somebody else are all my mailman lists. And so one thing i'm looking at
would be a way to send an announcement to all the lists on my server. I
und
Barbara Brust wrote:
>I am having a problem with sending out email blasts to an
>announcement ONLY list. I have it set on Emergency Moderation and
>have a few email addresses that are admins, as well as moderators,
>and yes, they are list members too, with their MOD turned off.
>Now I am NOT ab
I am having a problem with sending out email blasts to an
announcement ONLY list. I have it set on Emergency Moderation and
have a few email addresses that are admins, as well as moderators,
and yes, they are list members too, with their MOD turned off.
Now I am NOT able to send out email from a
On 3/8/2005 13:08, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>> I'm installing Mailman for a client, and they are testing it (this is a good
>> thing), and they ask:
>>
>> (8) Put list on emergency moderation and tried to post from subscribed
>> address
>> (do NOT get a
Larry Rosenman wrote:
>I'm installing Mailman for a client, and they are testing it (this is a good
>thing), and they ask:
>
>(8) Put list on emergency moderation and tried to post from subscribed address
>(do NOT get any notification to moderator that a message is pending. Seems
>like that is
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 02:30 pm, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I'm installing Mailman for a client, and they are testing it (this is a
> good thing), and they ask:
>
> (8) Put list on emergency moderation and tried to post from subscribed
> address (do NOT get any notification to moderator that a messa
I'm installing Mailman for a client, and they are testing it (this is a good
thing), and they ask:
(8) Put list on emergency moderation and tried to post from subscribed address
(do NOT get any notification to moderator that a message is pending. Seems
like that isn't right).
Is this a bug o
Hi Brad,
Thanks for your reply. The 'admin_immed_notify' option is turned on for my
lists and I went through the troubleshooting recommendations (following
which I didn't need to make any adjustments to my mailman configuration).
Interestingly this morning at 8 I received notification of posting
David W Smith wrote:
>
>I've switched on emergency moderation for a few for our mailing lists
>(using v 2.1.5 on a Debian Woody box) and thought I would receive email
>notification of any postings held for moderation. But this has turned out
>not to be the case.
The following is the docstring f
At 9:54 AM + 2005-02-09, David W Smith wrote:
I've switched on emergency moderation for a few for our mailing lists
(using v 2.1.5 on a Debian Woody box) and thought I would receive email
notification of any postings held for moderation. But this has turned
out not to be the case.
You shou
Hi,
I've switched on emergency moderation for a few for our mailing lists
(using v 2.1.5 on a Debian Woody box) and thought I would receive email
notification of any postings held for moderation. But this has turned out
not to be the case.
Does anyone know if email notifications should be sent
At 2:35 PM -0500 2005-02-03, Flip Side wrote:
BUT MESSAGES ARE STILL GETTING OUT to the members who
are no longer "subscribed" to the list.
They're probably in the MTA queue. Mailman has already handed
those messages off to your mail server, and they had not yet been
delivered. Now they are.
Hello,
I'm still trying to prevent queued messages from being
delivered to the list when i start mailman.
-no one is currently subscribed to the list (except
me)
-emergency moderation option is set
BUT MESSAGES ARE STILL GETTING OUT to the members who
are no longer "subscribed" to the list.
ass
At 5:56 PM -0800 2004-12-08, Evan Miller wrote:
postalias virtual
You don't use postalias on the virtal map. You use postmap
instead. You use postalias only on alias files.
Really, for all your postfix problems, you would be much better
served by going to the postfix-users mailing list, rea
Oh my god. This is the hardest UNIX problem I've EVER run into. 8+
hours and going.
First of all, every time I make changes to Postfix's virtual file, I
kill all my email and everyone starts getting rejected. Horrible.
Very very stressful. How do I force virtual.db to reflect changes I
ju
Dear frenz,
- I use RedHat7.2 and i have mailman -2.0.13-1 with
Namazu search.
- I have made newlist after installation for trial.
it was working fine.
-Very recently i have again made a new list and so
many people have joined. But i cannot see any archives after the approval of the
articles
38 matches
Mail list logo
