Re: [Mailman-Users] DomainKey problem with Mailman

Lindsay Haisley wrote: >On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:56 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS = Yes > >So what are the negative implications of doing this? Read the thread at and draw your own conclusions. --

Re: [Mailman-Users] DomainKey problem with Mailman

On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 09:56 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS = Yes So what are the negative implications of doing this? -- Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works|Accredited FMP Computer Services | if you let it" | by the 512-259-1190 |(The Roadie

Re: [Mailman-Users] DomainKey problem with Mailman

Lindsay Haisley wrote: > >So, since Mailman is the "agent responsible for the actual transmission >of the message", re-writing the Sender header doesn't appear to be a >violation of the spec, but there is a problem here. It appears that >Mailman _should_ either offer the option of preserving the o

[Mailman-Users] DomainKey problem with Mailman

One of the subscribers to a list I host (Jack McKinney) has been having a problem with inbound mail from the list getting rejected by his mail server. He's tracked it down to a problem with the Sender header field, which gets re-written by Mailman to the VERP address of the list bounce processor c