Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> --On 4. März 2009 06:32:52 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> If the above is not the answer, send me the raw message.
>
> Will do.
It turns out the message was some kind of edit of a prior list message
and when it was sent to the list, it still contained Mailman's origi
--On 4. März 2009 06:32:52 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
One thing that could be doing this given what you've said is if
Non-digest options -> scrub_nondigest is Yes,
It's not.
the message is HTML only
(not multipart/alternative)
It's not.
and ARCHIVE_HTML_SANITIZER = 0
It's not.
Another
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
>
> we're running Mailman 2.1.9 and can't upgrade because our Python is too
> old. Today we had an issue with a message that was sent by our secretary
> to our staff list. Her message kept being discarded by Mailman and I
> can't find the reason. The list in question has
Hi,
we're running Mailman 2.1.9 and can't upgrade because our Python is too
old. Today we had an issue with a message that was sent by our secretary to
our staff list. Her message kept being discarded by Mailman and I can't
find the reason. The list in question has all filter settings either t
