Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Anne Ramey wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Way 2 is to modify scripts/post to log something. At the end of the
>>> main() function following:
>>>
>>> inq = get_switchboard(mm_cfg.INQUEUE_DIR)
>>> inq.enqueue(sys.stdin.read(),
>>> listname=listname,
>>>
Anne Ramey wrote:
>
>> Way 2 is to modify scripts/post to log something. At the end of the
>> main() function following:
>>
>> inq = get_switchboard(mm_cfg.INQUEUE_DIR)
>> inq.enqueue(sys.stdin.read(),
>> listname=listname,
>> tolist=1, _plaintext=1)
>>
>> a
> Way 2 is to modify scripts/post to log something. At the end of the
> main() function following:
>
> inq = get_switchboard(mm_cfg.INQUEUE_DIR)
> inq.enqueue(sys.stdin.read(),
> listname=listname,
> tolist=1, _plaintext=1)
>
> add
>
> print >> sys.stder
Anne Ramey wrote:
>>
>Thank you for the reply. I have to restart Mailman this weekend (during
>our maintenance window) anyway for another change. I'll take way2 and
>see what I see the next week. I'll let you know the results.
Note that the patch to scripts/post does not require a Mailman
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Anne Ramey wrote:
>
>
>> Have a new and different one. One of my users that has two lists, let's
>> call them list1 and list2. If he sends a message to list1 and cc's
>> list2, list1 never receives the message. If he sends the same message
>> only to list1, it goes th
Anne Ramey wrote:
>Have a new and different one. One of my users that has two lists, let's
>call them list1 and list2. If he sends a message to list1 and cc's
>list2, list1 never receives the message. If he sends the same message
>only to list1, it goes through fine. According to my exim lo
Have a new and different one. One of my users that has two lists, let's
call them list1 and list2. If he sends a message to list1 and cc's
list2, list1 never receives the message. If he sends the same message
only to list1, it goes through fine. According to my exim logs, it is
delivering b
