Glenn Sieb wrote:
>Mark Sapiro said the following on 8/12/09 10:05 AM:
>
>> As Terry suggests, you could run bin/cleanarch as an additional
>> test/correction on the listname.mbox. There may be unescaped "From "
>> in message bodies that didn't confuse Mutt or that you didn't notice
>> with Mutt,
Mark Sapiro said the following on 8/12/09 10:05 AM:
> Do you see these Dec. 1999 messages when you look with Mutt?
>
*doublechecking* Yes. They look fine.
> It looks like someone or some script ran bin/arch on Mon Aug 10
> 18:53:40 EDT 2009 (and possibly at other times) with some spurious
> in
Glenn Sieb wrote:
>
>I'm running mailman-2.1.12, with the htdig patches on FreeBSD 7.0
>
>I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive
>mbox size is 175M.
>
>I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 "No
>subject" emails that "look funny."
>
>So I
Glenn Sieb wrote:
I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive
mbox size is 175M.
I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 "No
subject" emails that "look funny."
[snip]
From: "redacted"
To: redacted
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 23:27:19 PST
(body
Hullo,
I'm running mailman-2.1.12, with the htdig patches on FreeBSD 7.0
I have a list with archives that are about 10 years old. The archive
mbox size is 175M.
I was alerted by a subscriber that the August 2009 archives list 128 "No
subject" emails that "look funny."
So I looked.. sure enough
