Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2012-05-24 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Fletcher Cocquyt stanford.edu> writes: > > We receive this error: > > Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 > > We're sorry, we hit a bug! > I added a debug line to Archiver.py: syslog('error', 'Archive file access failure:\n\t%s %s', old, new) and it revealed the issue was a missing symlink in /var/

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2012-05-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 5/24/2012 5:41 PM, Fletcher Cocquyt wrote: > > When attempting to login to the admin interface and the logs say: > > May 24 17:32:05 2012 admin(20758): > > admin(20758): [- Mailman Version: 2.1.9 -] > admin(20758): [- Traceback --

[Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2012-05-24 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
We receive this error: Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 We're sorry, we hit a bug! Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find this information in the Mailman error logs. Whe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-15 Thread Mark Sapiro
Fabricio Oliveira wrote: > > I stoped the services and restored backup. I checked permssions and > started the services. After that the mailman doesn't restart, see logs: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File '/usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl', line 548, in ? > main() > File '

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-15 Thread Fabricio Oliveira
Hi Mark, I stoped the services and restored backup. I checked permssions and started the services. After that the mailman doesn't restart, see logs: Traceback (most recent call last): File '/usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl', line 548, in ?main() File '/usr/local/mailman/bin/mailmanctl',

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Fabricio Oliveira wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I see your considerations about permissions, but I don't know are SELinux. > What is this? SELinux is a security policy manager that can prevent file access based on security policies even though the access would be allowed by file permissions. > I st

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-11 Thread Fabricio Oliveira
-users@python.org> Subject: Re: RE: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9> > Fabricio Oliveira wrote:> > Hi Mark,> > > > See attachment file with the log.> > > Thank you for reposting the logs as an attachment. That is much better.> > Here is your log

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-10 Thread Mark Sapiro
Fabricio Oliveira wrote: > Hi Mark, > > See attachment file with the log. Thank you for reposting the logs as an attachment. That is much better. Here is your log data with my comments interspersed. > Log - /usr/local/mailman/logs/error > > Mar 08 10:48:37 2008 qrunner(1656): Traceback (mo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-10 Thread Fabricio Oliveira
Hi Mark, See attachment file with the log. Thanks. Regards,Fabrício> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:05:25 -0800> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: mailman-users@python.org> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9> > Fabricio Oliveira wrote:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-08 Thread Mark Sapiro
Fabricio Oliveira wrote: > Hi, > > When I try access the page of Mailman appear the error bellow: > > Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 > We're sorry, we hit a bug!Please inform the webmaster for this site of this > problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been > explicitly

[Mailman-Users] Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9

2008-03-08 Thread Fabricio Oliveira
Hi, When I try access the page of Mailman appear the error bellow: Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9 We're sorry, we hit a bug!Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the webmaster can find th