Re: [Mailman-Users] Broken signature because of multipart/alternative

2007-05-09 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Wilfred Gasper writes: > Thank you for this description. So there's nothing I can do against it > like using another version of Python? Well, another version of Python won't do. You need another version of the Internet. According to RFC 2822, Subject: a few words Subject: a few words Su

Re: [Mailman-Users] Broken signature because of multipart/alternative

2007-05-09 Thread Wilfred Gasper
Hi, Mark Sapiro wrote: Wilfred Gasper wrote: boundary="02020307030005020605" I don't think those are extra spaces. This is a folded header, and I think what happens is the original header is folded with and it is processed by Mailman for some reason and when refolded b

Re: [Mailman-Users] Broken signature because of multipart/alternative

2007-05-08 Thread Mark Sapiro
Wilfred Gasper wrote: > >I'm running Mailman 2.1.9 here at RWTH Aachen University. > >Our University recently started distributing smime-certificates signed >by our certificate authority. Now more and more people use our >mailinglists with signed messages. > >I disabled the footer and mime-filter

[Mailman-Users] Broken signature because of multipart/alternative

2007-05-08 Thread Wilfred Gasper
Hello everybody, I'm running Mailman 2.1.9 here at RWTH Aachen University. Our University recently started distributing smime-certificates signed by our certificate authority. Now more and more people use our mailinglists with signed messages. I disabled the footer and mime-filtering on my t