rpsch...@knology.net writes:
> Let me give further explanation of why I need this. The site I
> support is a community band. When there is an email set to
> everyone from the director about something, we do not want each
> person to reply to all. They should only be replying back to the
>
Geoff Shang wrote:
Frankly, I think the best approach would be just to moderate the list.
If people realise that follow-ups aren't going to get posted, they'll
stop sending them.
*chuckle*
From my experience, you over estimate some of the user base that I have
had the pleasure of supporting
Hi,
Frankly, I think the best approach would be just to moderate the list. If
people realise that follow-ups aren't going to get posted, they'll stop
sending them.
Geoff.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.p
On 5/2/2010 12:10 PM, rpsch...@knology.net wrote:
>
> This is what I'm trying to do. User x sends a post to listy. User z
> receives the post from the list.
>
> I want user Z only to be able to reply to user x and otherwise to be
> required to send a new, origional, not-preply message to the list
On 5/1/2010 2:27 PM, Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
> That seems to be the issue. When I looked at the email from my work
> email I saw the header text that was added, but my message was added
> as an attachment. I like the header text to be added and the message
> not to appear as an attachment.
23 PM
To: rpsch...@knology.net; Schwartz, Robert - IS; 'Terri Oda';
mailman-users@python.org
Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Block reply to all
Robert P. Schwartz wrote:
>I tried this an I'm not getting any header. I tried it for non-digest
>options and digest options.
If you
Robert P. Schwartz wrote:
>I tried this an I'm not getting any header. I tried it for non-digest
>options and digest options.
If you put text in msg_header and saved that change and then sent a
post to that list and the post as received from the list didn't
contain the header text, it may be be
il 30, 2010 11:06 PM
To: Schwartz, Robert - IS; Terri Oda; mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Block reply to all
Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
>Maybe I can put a message at the top of every mail being send "Do not do a
reply all". How do you do this?
The list a
Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
>Grant suggested:
>
>To directly answer your question (and for the benefit of others searching the
>archives) I think the best that you will be able to do is to filter messages
>based on the existence of the standard reply headers ("References:" and
>"In-Reply-To:")
Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
>Maybe I can put a message at the top of every mail being send "Do not do a
>reply all". How do you do this?
The list admin interface Non-digest options -> msg_header
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter
Maybe I can put a message at the top of every mail being send "Do not do a
reply all". How do you do this?
Robert P. Schwartz
Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
> Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my users to not
> be able to reply to all to post a message. If the want
n.org
[mailto:mailman-users-bounces+robert.schwartz=itt@python.org] On Behalf Of
Terri Oda
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 1:03 PM
To: mailman-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Block reply to all
Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
> Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my
Grant suggested:
To directly answer your question (and for the benefit of others searching the
archives) I think the best that you will be able to do is to filter messages
based on the existence of the standard reply headers ("References:" and
"In-Reply-To:") and reject the message(s).
Does an
>You can do this under Privacy Options -> Recipient Filters
>Set "Ceiling on acceptable number of recipients for a posting." to 1
>
>Then anyone hitting reply-to-all will get a message saying that their
>message is held because there are too many recipients, since any
>reply-to-all will include b
Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my users to not
be able to reply to all to post a message. If the want to post a message, they
should post it not just reply to a previous message.
As others have said, I'm not sure this is a good idea
* Carl Zwanzig :
> On 4/30/2010 7:23 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> >* Schwartz, Robert - IS:
> >
> >>Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my users
> >>to not be able to reply to all to post a message. If the want to post
> >>a message, they should post it not just reply to
On 4/30/2010 7:23 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Schwartz, Robert - IS:
Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my users
to not be able to reply to all to post a message. If the want to post
a message, they should post it not just reply to a previous message.
Set the rep
On 04/29/10 13:26, Schwartz, Robert - IS wrote:
Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all?
To directly answer your question (and for the benefit of others
searching the archives) I think the best that you will be able to do is
to filter messages based on the existence of the standard rep
On 04/30/10 09:23, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Set the reply-to: to something wrong :)
That will not work.
Reply-to-All will reply to the incorrect Reply-To as well as all other
senders.
There is also a possibility that a spam filter will detect that the
Reply-To is invalid and will consider t
* Schwartz, Robert - IS :
> Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my users
> to not be able to reply to all to post a message. If the want to post
> a message, they should post it not just reply to a previous message.
Set the reply-to: to something wrong :)
--
Ralf Hild
Does anyone know a way to block a reply to all? I would like my users to not
be able to reply to all to post a message. If the want to post a message, they
should post it not just reply to a previous message.
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be
21 matches
Mail list logo
