Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-05-02 Thread J C Lawrence
On Wed, 02 May 2001 10:02:38 +0100 Nigel Metheringham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> The standard *nix approach is to use the process ID which is >> guaranteed unique. If you're not running an *ix, just have one >> process use numerically even tempfile names, and the o

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-05-02 Thread Nigel Metheringham
Someone wrote (I got completely lost with the attributions in this and can't find the original):- > I ran into a strange little problem today -- I'm using time() to > generate a filename for a temporary directory. Works great; until > you start running multiple processes on a 2 CPU machine. I st

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-05-02 Thread J C Lawrence
On Tue, 01 May 2001 21:28:03 -0700 Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/1/01 8:52 PM, "Barry A. Warsaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've avoid that because of NFS issues, i.e. if you've got >> multiple Mailman installations sharing an NFS partition, the pids >> aren't relevant.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-05-01 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
I'm CC'ing Mailman developers because I want to get some feedback from the Unix hackers amonst us; apologies for duplicates... >> We also experienced similar problems in the past with large >> lists. We found that if the admin is accessing the long and >> slow-loading members admin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-04-27 Thread Graham TerMarsch
On Friday 27 April 2001 13:46, Gergo Soros wrote: > > Running Mailman-2.0.1, with Python 1.5.2 on a RedHat 6.2 machine along > > w/Apache-1.3.14 and Sendmail-8.11.0, and am having some serious grief > > with stale lockfiles on one of our lists. List contains ~60k > > addresses on it, and has cons

Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-04-27 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Graham TerMarsch wrote: > I'm finding, though, that the WWW processes are regularly creating stale > locks that sit around and hold everything up. > > Any and all information, tips, pointers, or suggestions are welcome. I have a perl script run every 15 minutes and check for lock files. Any

Re: [Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-04-27 Thread Gergo Soros
> Running Mailman-2.0.1, with Python 1.5.2 on a RedHat 6.2 machine along > w/Apache-1.3.14 and Sendmail-8.11.0, and am having some serious grief with > stale lockfiles on one of our lists. List contains ~60k addresses on it, > and has constant traffic to the WWW administration pages. Not high

[Mailman-Users] Big problems with stale lockfiles on large list...

2001-04-27 Thread Graham TerMarsch
Running Mailman-2.0.1, with Python 1.5.2 on a RedHat 6.2 machine along w/Apache-1.3.14 and Sendmail-8.11.0, and am having some serious grief with stale lockfiles on one of our lists. List contains ~60k addresses on it, and has constant traffic to the WWW administration pages. Not high volume