Re: [Mailman-Users] Best version of Python to use with Mailman 2.1.9?

2007-02-14 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:14 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 1:03 PM -0600 2/12/07, Brad Knowles wrote: > >> Use the latest version of 2.4.x. As you've demonstrated, the 2.5 >> stuff is not yet fully baked, and Mailman 2.1.8 and earlier are not >> compat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Best version of Python to use with Mailman

2007-02-13 Thread vancleef
The esteemed Brad Knowles has said: > > Use the latest version of 2.4.x. As you've demonstrated, the 2.5 > stuff is not yet fully baked, and Mailman 2.1.8 and earlier are not > compatible with it. $DEITY-only-knows what else they're going to > break in the process of trying to "fix" 2.5. > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Best version of Python to use with Mailman 2.1.9?

2007-02-12 Thread Brad Knowles
At 1:03 PM -0600 2/12/07, Brad Knowles wrote: > Use the latest version of 2.4.x. As you've demonstrated, the 2.5 > stuff is not yet fully baked, and Mailman 2.1.8 and earlier are not > compatible with it. $DEITY-only-knows what else they're going to > break in the process of trying to "fix"

Re: [Mailman-Users] Best version of Python to use with Mailman 2.1.9?

2007-02-12 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:51 AM -0700 2/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was aware, when I downloaded the Mailman 2.1.9 sources, that the > recommended Python is given as 2.4.3. That recommendation may be a little old. > A trip to the Python site > showed that 2.4.4 was

[Mailman-Users] Best version of Python to use with Mailman 2.1.9?

2007-02-12 Thread vancleef
Now that I've got Mailman up and running relatively smoothly in "production" mode, I've taken some time to revisit questions primarily involving Python. The Mailman installation I am running has several non-standard lashups and workarounds that really need some cleanup, and Mark Sapiro has convinc