On 08/27/2015 01:58 AM, Mark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number of
> mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This version
> was updated in July as follows:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1417.html and included fixes f
Sorry, serious finger fumble there. Please ignore the messed up one.
Andrew Hodgson writes:
> That is interesting, and I wonder if this is something to do with
> the way that Redhat have implemented the new feature.
My guess is that Red Hat backported 2.1.17 or 2.1.18-1. After getting
compla
Mark writes:
> Is there any other code in the standard mailman where the reply-to
> is populated with the original sender? I realise fully aware that
> the version of mailman I have here isn't supported, or released,
> and other bugs may have been introduced.
In standard Mailman >= 2.1.18-1
Will Yardley writes:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Stock Mailman 2.1.12 doesn't do any DMARC detection. This is quite
> > bizarre that they would backport such a feature rather than update to
> > 2.1.18-1 or later. Mailman 2.1 is hardly an unstabl
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:10:53AM -0500, Barry S. Finkel wrote:
> On 8/28/2015 3:03 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> >> Mark writes:
> >> > First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a
> >> > number of mailman lists
On 8/28/2015 3:03 AM, Will Yardley wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark writes:
> First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number
> of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This
> version was updated in J
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Mark writes:
> > First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number
> > of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This
> > version was updated in July as follows:
> > https://rhn.redhat.
Mark wrote:
>Step 1: email is sent to the list - the mail to DMARC protected domain is
>received ok by Yahoo web client. Reply-to is set to the list.
>
>Message source of first email is:
>
> From: Mark
> Reply-To: Test
>
>Step 2: Reply from Yahoo client sends an email to the list and this h
On 28/08/15 4:37 pm, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Stock Mailman 2.1.12 doesn't do any DMARC detection. This is quite
bizarre that they would backport such a feature rather than update to
2.1.18-1 or later. Mailman 2.1 is hardly an unstable package.
I am not sure why the changes were back-porte
Mark writes:
> First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number
> of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This
> version was updated in July as follows:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1417.html and included
> fixes for a number of DMARC iss
Hi,
First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This version was updated in July as follows:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1417.html and included fixes for a number of DMARC issues. Including "... W
Hi,
First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This version was updated in July as follows:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1417.html and included fixes for a number of DMARC issues. Including "... W
12 matches
Mail list logo
