On 11/13/2010 4:12 AM, Andre van Kan wrote:
>
> I should have firstly explained the consistency of our recently
> installed mailsystem: three separate IP-clusters (!) cooperate to
> handle our e-mail and except for MM they perform very well.
> (btw, it was designed and installed by an external pa
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:12:18PM +0100, Andre van Kan wrote:
> - cluster 1: runs the MTA (Postfix) and MM
> - cluster 2: runs Horde and the MM-webinterface
> - cluster 3: runs Cyrus-imapd
>
> Cluster 1 and 2 share - via NFS - the MM-lists etc. I found out however
> that data/heldms* was only
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 07:48 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >> I understand that, but the data/heldmsg* file could have been removed
> >>> external to Mailman before that.
> >
> > I never found any heldmsg* on the system, nor any complaint
> > that such a file could not be written. Maybe could an str
On 11/5/2010 6:44 AM, André van Kan wrote:
>
>> I understand that, but the data/heldmsg* file could have been removed
>>> external to Mailman before that.
>
> I never found any heldmsg* on the system, nor any complaint
> that such a file could not be written. Maybe could an strace of
> the approp
> I understand that, but the data/heldmsg* file could have been removed
> > external to Mailman before that.
I never found any heldmsg* on the system, nor any complaint
that such a file could not be written. Maybe could an strace of
the appropriate qrunner be of some help?
> > The attached admin
Andre van Kan wrote:
>
>On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 07:12 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>>
>> > Can you send me off list a copy of Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py from your
>> > system?
>>
>> I received that. Thank you. Unfortunately, there's nothing there that
>> helps explain this issue. I c
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Can you send me off list a copy of Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py from your
> system?
I received that. Thank you. Unfortunately, there's nothing there that
helps explain this issue. I can work up a patch to provide debug
logging, but before I do that, is there anything in Mailman's '
André van Kan wrote:
>
>I found out that as soon as the list-administrator just selects the link in
>the " requires approval" message as sent by mailman, ("Reason: Post
>by non-member to a members-only list") the message is discarded at that
>very moment! (vette log update detected)
>
>After t
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply.
> Please post to the list, not to me personally.
Point taken. And sure, you are Mark, not Larry, sorry ;-)
> However, the above messages, presumably from Mailman's vette log, come
> from two different PIDs. Thus, I'm guessing that you are approving these
> mes
On 10/29/2010 8:11 AM, André van Kan wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> Although we have the same problem, ours is even weird in
> some aspects. I made an test-list - groep3 - with two members.
> If mail is send by a non-member, all messages are discarded
> after approval:
>
> Oct 29 15:59:09 2010 (20460) gr
On 10/4/2010 11:51 AM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
>
> What caused the message to be discarded after it was approved?
Most likely, Content filtering -> filter_action is Discard, and there
was nothing left of the message after content filtering. E.g. the
message was text/html or maybe multipart/re
On 10/4/2010 1:06 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Rosenbaum, Larry M. :
>>
>> Oct 04 10:35:12 2010 (21271) X_Cohorts post from michael.x...@.edu
>> held,
>> message-id=<2034674bf9d4714bae35b22bf073eef402e70...@ms-..edu>: Post
>> to moderated list
>> Oct 04 10:38:26 2010 (5774) he
* Rosenbaum, Larry M. :
> We are running Mailman v2.1.13 on Solaris 9 Sparc. We have a list with about
> 13,000 members that we currently have "emergency moderation" turned on
> because of previous problems with reply storms.
>
> Today somebody sent a message to the list, which (of course) was
We are running Mailman v2.1.13 on Solaris 9 Sparc. We have a list with about
13,000 members that we currently have "emergency moderation" turned on because
of previous problems with reply storms.
Today somebody sent a message to the list, which (of course) was held for
moderation. The list ow
14 matches
Mail list logo
