On 05/14/2013 09:23 AM, Michael Probst wrote:
>
> In the first step we approve only subscriptions with email accounts from
> a member company. Someone with a subscription can then later on change
> his mail address to one of another company that might not be a member
> company of our organization.
On 5/13/13 11:06 AM, Michael Probst wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I hope this is the right mailing list to ask this kind of questions.
>
> We run mailing lists with mailman for an organization with multiple
> groups and
> each group has its own mailing list(s). Our policy requires that
> subscriptions are
Dear all,
I hope this is the right mailing list to ask this kind of questions.
We run mailing lists with mailman for an organization with multiple
groups and
each group has its own mailing list(s). Our policy requires that
subscriptions are
approved by a moderator.
However, we got requests from
At 5:59 PM +0100 2006-05-15, David Lee wrote:
>> I'm not convinced that having per-user approval passwords would
>> help the moderators act in a more consistent manner, but it certainly
>> wouldn't hurt.
>
> Hm? The idea is that the genuine sender should be able to avoid
> moderation in
On Mon, 15 May 2006, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 10:01 AM +0100 2006-05-15, David Lee wrote:
>
> >Is there a facility, or
> > plans for such, for each permitted sender to have (optionally) their own
> > password, useable across many lists?
>
>
At 10:01 AM +0100 2006-05-15, David Lee wrote:
>Is there a facility, or
> plans for such, for each permitted sender to have (optionally) their own
> password, useable across many lists?
This is a very good question. I'm glad you broug
On 5/15/06, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List subscribers can already have passwords attached to their membership
> of a particular list, but this is (I understand) only for subscription
> maintenance, not for posting authorisation. So the concept of password
> linked to email address is
Background:
Currently majordomo, but rapid switch to Mailman being considered.
About 20,000 users.
Over 2,000 lists, the majority being "announcement" with very limited
numbers of permitted senders.
Have been majordomo-based for many years.
Recent spoof email jumped the priority of a
Lauren Weinstein wrote:
>By the way, I just wanted to say how incredibly useful I'm
>finding Mailman. It was a bit of work to convert over from
>my ancient, hand-cranked Majordomo systems, but it was worth it.
>
>While I think of it, is there any way for me to cause the full text
>of submissions
Lauren Weinstein wrote:
>Greetings. I've just started transmissions on my first Mailman-hosted
>direct participation list, and I've noticed a couple of oddities, both
>likely the result of configuration issues.
>
> - Attempts to approve or reject moderated postings via e-mail
> fail. The reaso
Greetings. I've just started transmissions on my first Mailman-hosted
direct participation list, and I've noticed a couple of oddities, both
likely the result of configuration issues.
- Attempts to approve or reject moderated postings via e-mail
fail. The reason is obvious -- the message hea
Actually they do have the same reason. Post by a non-member? Which is
really weird, cause the user is a member..
The post still goes through to all my test members. And if I do post a
message by a non-member the message won't go through.
Keep the ideas coming, I am greatly appreciative.
---
- Original Message ---
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Approval
From: Derrick Seymour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 09:17:52 -0400
To: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Actually they do have the same reason. Post by a non-member? Which i
Derrick Seymour wrote:
>Would there be any reason why I am receiving two approval emails for every
>post on a list. Should I receive an approval email for every post?
Depends on list settings.
>If yes
>or no, why am I receiving two?
Do they both give the same reason for why the post is held fo
Would there be any reason why I am receiving two approval emails for every
post on a list. Should I receive an approval email for every post? If yes
or no, why am I receiving two?
OSX Server 10.3.4
Pretty new still, any help would be great..sorry for the greenness
Derrick Seymour
---
Turns out that others have had this problem. I finally solved it when I
found that there were some lists that were working.
The problem was that in some places (on multiple servers) I had
listname-owner -> listname-admin
so when mailman sent a message out, it didn't get rewritten to the
owner
I just upgraded mailman from 2.0.something to 2.1.5. Everything went
really well (thanks, that was great). However, I am running into one
weird even that is occurring.
When a non-user sends a message that requires approval. The approval
message gets sent from listname-owner to listname-owner.
I've been trying out the moderation system in 2.1b3, and have found that
using the reply mechanism has no effect - the message stays in the approval
queue.
The reply goes to the list-request address. The Subject is "confirm ". I put the line "Approved: listpassword" on the first line of the
reply
>Web approval works for me in 2.1b3, but I've never tried email
>approval.
When i press Approve (or Reject), and press "Submit All Data" it just loops
back to the same page without doing anything.
Then i can try to "Submit All Data" again, but still without success.
Any idea on what is going
On 9/25/02 10:54 AM, "Stonewall Ballard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying out the moderation system in 2.1b3, and have found that
> using the reply mechanism has no effect - the message stays in the approval
> queue.
>
> The reply goes to the list-request address. The Subject is "co
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:45:45 -0400
Stonewall Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/25/02 12:08 PM, "Henrik Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > At 10:54 25-09-2002 -0400, you wrote:
> >> I've been trying out the moderation system in 2.1b3, and have
> >found that> using the reply mecha
On 9/25/02 12:08 PM, "Henrik Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:54 25-09-2002 -0400, you wrote:
>> I've been trying out the moderation system in 2.1b3, and have found that
>> using the reply mechanism has no effect - the message stays in the approval
>> queue.
>>
>> The reply goes to th
At 10:54 25-09-2002 -0400, you wrote:
>I've been trying out the moderation system in 2.1b3, and have found that
>using the reply mechanism has no effect - the message stays in the approval
>queue.
>
>The reply goes to the list-request address. The Subject is "confirm string>". I put the line "Appr
I've been trying out the moderation system in 2.1b3, and have found that
using the reply mechanism has no effect - the message stays in the approval
queue.
The reply goes to the list-request address. The Subject is "confirm ". I put the line "Approved: listpassword" on the first line of the
reply
At 08:09 01/08/2002 -0700, Fawad Khan wrote:
>After creating a new test list I set the option under privacy options
>That the mails being sent to this mail need not be approved by an
>Administrator but I still keep getting the following mail.
>
>But, then it never sends me an email asking me to ap
Did you subscribe to the list after creating it?
Irwin
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [Mailman-Users] Approval notice
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:09:30 -0700
From: "Fawad Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After creating a new test list
After creating a new test list I set the option under privacy options
That the mails being sent to this mail need not be approved by an
Administrator but I still keep getting the following mail.
But, then it never sends me an email asking me to approve or disapprove
this Email. Ideally I'd like
On Tue, 2002-05-14 at 12:56, Jessie Kleefstra wrote:
>
> We are in the process of converting all of our distibution lists to
> Mailman lists. A customer has just sent me an email asking why she has
> received a request to approve a posting from herself to the list when she
> is the list administr
On Tue, 14 May 2002 15:56:56 -0400 (EDT)
Jessie Kleefstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are in the process of converting all of our distibution lists to
> Mailman lists. A customer has just sent me an email asking why she has
> received a request to approve a posting from herself to the list w
We are in the process of converting all of our distibution lists to
Mailman lists. A customer has just sent me an email asking why she has
received a request to approve a posting from herself to the list when she
is the list administrator? Is there a reason why this is happening?
Thanks
-
J
Is it possible not to receive this message :
"Your subscription request has been forwarded to the list administrator
at --- for review."
for a subscription via mail (list-request@--- "subscribe address=--")
Thank you
Sylvie Greverend
--
Mailman
Hi ...
I'm using mailman 2.0.8 and it's working fine except for one little
detail but annoying. In the general options of my 2 lists, I choosed
"No" for the "(Administrivia filter) Check postings and intercept ones
that seem to be administrative requests?". But when I send a mail from a
subsc
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:12:44PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I recently set up several lists and the messages are requiring me to
> approve them because they have "implicit destination". Any idea
> what I can change in my configuration to take care of this
> problem???
Put a regexp that
I recently set up several lists and the messages
are requiring me to approve them because they have "implicit destination".
Any idea what I can change in my configuration to take care of this
problem???
I'm on digest version so please be sure your
reply goes to my email address (alone or
34 matches
Mail list logo