On 3/4/18 4:30 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is anyone bothered by this?
Now that I know it has a history, I could become quite fond of it.
If it comes down to definitions of each word, I'm fine with either, although I
generally talk to other moderators about approving messages a
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Is anyone bothered by this?
Now that I know it has a history, I could become quite fond of it.
If it comes down to definitions of each word, I'm fine with either, although I
generally talk to other moderators about approving messages and subscriptions
rather than accepting
(This based on my understanding of modern English usage in the USA. YMMV)
On 3/2/2018 11:03 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
but that leaves an inconsistency on the summary page itself with (un)subs
being "Approved" and messages being "Accepted".
That's not necessarily inconsistent. A subscription would b
On 03/01/2018 07:28 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
> On the moderator summary page, the available options are Defer, Approve,
> Reject or Discard.
>
> On the detail page, they're Defer, Accept, Reject or Discard.
>
> Only a cosmetic difference, but perhaps someone could change one to match the
> other?
On 03/01/2018 07:28 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
> On the moderator summary page, the available options are Defer, Approve,
> Reject or Discard.
>
> On the detail page, they're Defer, Accept, Reject or Discard.
>
> Only a cosmetic difference, but perhaps someone could change one to match the
> other?
On the moderator summary page, the available options are Defer, Approve, Reject
or Discard.
On the detail page, they're Defer, Accept, Reject or Discard.
Only a cosmetic difference, but perhaps someone could change one to match the
other?
Peter Shute
---
