Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL and spam reports

2003-11-10 Thread Vivek Khera
> "RKB" == Ryan K Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RKB> Please let us know if they are actually able to whitelist you. I've RKB> been trying for months to no avail. Perhaps you have found a more RKB> intelligent person. They don't "whitelist" you. You can sign a third party mail agreem

Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL and spam reports

2003-11-09 Thread Ricardo Kustner
M Ondercin wrote: At 10:25 PM 11/4/2003 -0600, you wrote: If you really have to deal with this, then send a final notice that all AOL users will be set to nomail and must set themselves back if they want to be on the list. Include directions for resetting from Nomail. Send the message,

Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL and spam reports

2003-11-08 Thread Ryan K. Brooks
Please let us know if they are actually able to whitelist you. I've been trying for months to no avail. Perhaps you have found a more intelligent person. -Ryan M Ondercin wrote: The 554 error is a new one, they don't even have much info on it in their help resources. They ran our s

Re: [Mailman-Users] AOL and spam reports

2003-11-08 Thread M Ondercin
At 10:25 PM 11/4/2003 -0600, you wrote: If you really have to deal with this, then send a final notice that all AOL users will be set to nomail and must set themselves back if they want to be on the list. Include directions for resetting from Nomail. Send the message, generate a digest, t

[Mailman-Users] AOL and spam reports

2003-11-04 Thread Paul H Byerly
If you really have to deal with this, then send a final notice that all AOL users will be set to nomail and must set themselves back if they want to be on the list. Include directions for resetting from Nomail. Send the message, generate a digest, then change all the AOL folks. It's