Re: [Mailman-Users] 20 Million Fresh E-mail Addresses

2001-02-06 Thread Dan Mick
Peter Hutnick wrote: > > As I said earlier, I (for no good reason) thought this option "turned on" the >"without implicit approval" field below. > > Maybe it is time for glasses (or just a nap.) > > Someone replied that this option sends non-member messages to the list admin. Is >there a w

Re: [Mailman-Users] 20 Million Fresh E-mail Addresses

2001-02-06 Thread Peter Hutnick
As I said earlier, I (for no good reason) thought this option "turned on" the "without implicit approval" field below. Maybe it is time for glasses (or just a nap.) Someone replied that this option sends non-member messages to the list admin. Is there a way to just blackhole them? -Peter >

Re: [Mailman-Users] 20 Million Fresh E-mail Addresses

2001-02-06 Thread Dan Mick
> Is there a way to configure Mailman so that subscribers do not need > approval, but non-subscribers do? So, have you looked at the administration pages at all? Privacy Options/General posting filters/Restrict posting privilege to list members? might be germane, I dunno.

Re: [Mailman-Users] 20 Million Fresh E-mail Addresses

2001-02-06 Thread Peter Hutnick
This ties in nicely with a question that I asked earlier. Is there a way to configure Mailman so that subscribers do not need approval, but non-subscribers do? > Do you think we can fix this, or everyone is going > to be unsubscribing to avoid the spam ... > >> >> TO BE REMOVED FR

[Mailman-Users] 20 Million Fresh E-mail Addresses

2001-02-06 Thread Luke
TO BE REMOVED FROM FUTURE MAILINGS, SIMPLY REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AND PUT "REMOVE" IN THE SUBJECT. 20 MILLION E-MAIL ADDRESSES FOR ONLY $249 **Over Night International Shipping Included** Many Call This "The "Perfect E-Mail List" Over 20-Million Of The Best E-Mail Addresses Av