Re: [Mailman-Users] mmarch mbox-splitting weird...

2009-03-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: > >however, this leaves me with one remaining problem: >rebuilding the archives will rename several tenthousands of emails. >while our archives do have a search functionality, this will still break >links to most archived emails. This i

Re: [Mailman-Users] mmarch mbox-splitting weird...

2009-03-17 Thread IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig)
Mark Sapiro wrote: You need to first clean your .mbox files with Mailman's bin/cleanarch or some other process to escape the "From " lines that aren't message separators. ah thanks, that will hopefully do the trick. however, this leaves me with one remaining problem: rebuilding the archives

[Mailman-Users] mmarch mbox-splitting weird...

2009-03-16 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) writes: > i noticed that this "bug" (or whatever it is) might have been available > for quite some time: after some searching of my original archives, Most likely all the "new" messages start with the word "From". It turns out that the only

Re: [Mailman-Users] mmarch mbox-splitting weird...

2009-03-16 Thread Mark Sapiro
IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: > >i fixed my hacks, but in order to get the archives right i ran >"mmarch --wipe ...", and found myself suprised that this did not produce >the desired results: the new archives seemed to contain some more emails >than the original ones

[Mailman-Users] mmarch mbox-splitting weird...

2009-03-16 Thread IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig)
hi. i recently upgraded my mailing list server from debian etch to lenny, which included an upgrade from mailman 2.1.9 to 2.1.11; due to some local hackery this somewhat broke my mailing list archives (the hackery only makes monthly archives available as e.g. 2009-03 rather than 2009-March o