On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 12:37 -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
> The current FAQ Wizard has the advantage of simplicity and
> tracking all previous changes (in case things need to be rolled
> back). Wikis, by their nature, are considerably more complex and at
> least some of them don't track cha
At 12:04 PM -0400 2006-04-28, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> That's fine. I'm not going to worry about changing that, since at some
> point the FAQ should be moved to the new Wiki. (Any volunteers?)
The current FAQ Wizard has the advantage of simplicity and
tracking all previous changes (in c
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:35 +0100, Richard Barrett wrote:
> The reason the [EMAIL PROTECTED] got emailed about the problem
> was that the footers on the Mailman FAQ says "Feedback to Mailman FAQ
> Owner" and "FAQ Owner" is in an anchor tag with href value
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Unfo
On 27 Apr 2006, at 16:26, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:04 +0100, Richard Barrett wrote:
>> And your point is?
>>
>> Of course I be deluded and imagining the error response I got back
>> but then again 17 days is a long time in the life of a file's
>> permissions.
>
> Indeed. Aft
And your point is?
Of course I be deluded and imagining the error response I got back
but then again 17 days is a long time in the life of a file's
permissions.
Richard
btw: I think I have seen comments about the same problem in recent
postings to the recent mailman-user archives by other
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:04 +0100, Richard Barrett wrote:
> And your point is?
>
> Of course I be deluded and imagining the error response I got back
> but then again 17 days is a long time in the life of a file's
> permissions.
Indeed. After I sent my response, I noticed that your original
