> "SW" == Simon White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SW> Kinda tough if you don't have the mailman version in the
SW> cookie. A good reason to put it in there, from now on, if it
SW> isn't there.
SW> Any other parameter in the cookie which has changed could be
SW> detected b
31-Jan-03 at 00:40, Barry A. Warsaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> > "WY" == Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> WY> If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to
> WY> re-login for every page until you manually clear the cookie
> WY> from your browser (af
> "WY" == Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WY> If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to
WY> re-login for every page until you manually clear the cookie
WY> from your browser (after upgrading to 2.1).
WY> Is there any way to fix this in the future?
29-Jan-03 at 13:37, Will Yardley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to re-login
> for every page until you manually clear the cookie from your browser
> (after upgrading to 2.1).
>
> Is there any way to fix this in the future? With some browsers
If you have an old cookie from Mailman 2.0.x, you'll have to re-login
for every page until you manually clear the cookie from your browser
(after upgrading to 2.1).
Is there any way to fix this in the future? With some browsers, it's not
simple to remove an individual cookie.
--
"Since when is s
