Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't remove illegal members on a list

2004-01-07 Thread Omar Walid Llorente
I had a similar problem with one of my lists when i upgraded from 2.0.x to 2.1.3, and solved it using the -f option of remove_members (using the output from list_members). Hope that helps. Omar. Centro

Re: [Mailman-Users] error with python running check_perms

2003-11-10 Thread Omar Walid Llorente
Last Friday i had the same problem that Javier had on May, so here is my posting about it. I solved it by exporting the LANG environment variable to "C", i.e. for bash shell: $ export LANG=C I was upgrading from 2.0.6 to 2.1.3 mailman version in a Red Hat Linux 9.0 distro with

[Mailman-Users] Any one can Help .... PLZ !!!

2002-04-20 Thread walid
Hi All,   I had installed Mailman "version 2.0.10 (101270)" on my website and it seems that it is working fine BUT   I can recieve a confirmation email when Subscriping ,but when i replay back there is no welcom email !!   can any one tell me what email account I have to create on my web

Re: Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with mail address

2001-02-08 Thread Omar Walid Llorente
I have solved the problem by using the remove_members script (./remove_members list "[EMAIL PROTECTED] \"luis"). Thanks for your help and sorry for not trying this before... Omar. El 07.02.01, Omar Walid Llorente dijo: : : :At 19:22 +0100 2/6/01, Omar

Re: Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with mail address

2001-02-07 Thread Omar Walid Llorente
:At 19:22 +0100 2/6/01, Omar Walid Llorente wrote: : :> Hi, one of my lists admins had put on the Membership :>Management Section an incorrect mail address. Exactly what :>he put is: :>[EMAIL PROTECTED] "luis :>and that is what shows the Membership page. :> : :>

[Mailman-Users] Problem with mail address

2001-02-06 Thread Omar Walid Llorente
Hi, one of my lists admins had put on the Membership Management Section an incorrect mail address. Exactly what he put is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "luis and that is what shows the Membership page. As far as i know this could modify the mailman behaviour (version i'm using is 1.1) becau