nevermind... sorry... figured it out... thanks...
> hi all...
>
> i'm really tired of clients batching over the subscription confirmation:
> "but why?", "nobody will do it and we goanna lose people?", "it's to
> difficult", "can we do it without it?!", "our list is special..", etc,
> etc...
hi all...
i'm really tired of clients batching over the subscription confirmation:
"but why?", "nobody will do it and we goanna lose people?", "it's to
difficult", "can we do it without it?!", "our list is special..", etc,
etc...
so i did change the settings in Defaults.py but it's still asking f
) list: pending [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 04
> 20:17:25 2007 (5670) list: pending [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 04
> 20:17:25 2007 (5670) list: pending [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 04
> 20:17:25 2007 (5670) list: pending kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Apr 04
20:17:25 2007 (5670) list: pending [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apr 04
20:17:25 2007 (5670) list: pending kalin mintchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
still i have not gotten the email where i'm supposed to confirm my
subscription.
my name is not in the queu
hi all..
what is the difference between listname-join and listname-subscribe?!
thanks
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/fa
hi all...
the email address the email is coming from is in the field:
"List of non-member addresses whose postings should be automatically
accepted."
i just get: Your message was rejected. that's all. no explanation...
there is nothing in the logs. just rejected - that's it...
why?
thanks
> the output from the error log for the same times is a bit longer so i'm
> attaching it.
i guess no attachments ok here it is:
Jun 08 06:43:23 2006 qrunner(8159): Traceback (most recent call last):
Jun 08 06:43:23 2006 qrunner(8159): File "/var/mailman/bin/qrunner",
line 270, in ?
Jun
> I still don't know what the underlying issue is, possibly you have so
> many bounces that the bounce-events-.pck reaches some size limitation.
> What does the 'qrunner' log say about the deaths? What's in the
> 'error' log.
well BounceRunner died apparently short after i restarted everything
ag
> the former. i don't see the BounceRunner in the mailman processes and will
> start it through mailmanctl but i remember reading somewhere that that
> daemon should run every 15 min?!? by default?!
ok. i did restart the daemons. but is till don't see BounceRunner in the
ps list
after getti
>
> Are you talking about files in qfiles/bounces/ or files in data/ named
> bounce-events-p.pck?
the former. i don't see the BounceRunner in the mailman processes and will
start it through mailmanctl but i remember reading somewhere that that
daemon should run every 15 min?!? by default?!
hi...
i have a huge directory full of bounces and much of disk space left. i'll
be add a new disk soon but can i just wipe out all the bounce files under
bounces?!!
thanks...
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail
hi all...
from a recent post (02.06):
> If the bounce runner is
> stopped or restarted when there is an outstanding file, the file can
> be orphaned and the bounces lost.
please somebody clarify "outstanding file". how would i know which one is
outstanding?
can there be more than one bounce-e
hi all...
i have a set up of mailman that hosts a lot of email lists. recently more
and more people want to have a list but a lot of them don't want their
users to go through all the subscription-confirmation-welcome messages
process. i took off the welcome messages but not sure how to avoid th
> At 8:24 PM -0500 2006-02-16, kalin mintchev wrote:
>> i have a set up of mailman that hosts a lot of email lists. recently
>> more
>> and more people want to have a list but a lot of them don't want their
users to go through all the subscription-confirmation-welcom
> There may be entries in Mailman's qrunner log noting when the bounce
>runner died and there may be associated error log entries that might
help > >determine why.
hi Mark...
here is the log for the last restart of mailman today... there isn't
anything about BounceRunner. i used mailmanctl...
have all of those except 'runner=BounceRunner:0:1 -s'
?!??!?!
thanks...
>> i do have the qrunner on but which one is the "bounce queue runner"?!
>
> ps -aux | grep qrunner
> mailman253 0.0 1.433284 12792 ?? S13Oct05
> 12:49.98 /usr/bin/python /usr/share/mailman/bin/qrunner -
hi all...
i found (and deleted) a bunch of relatively big bounce-events-* files
under the data directory.
on line i found a posting citing:
- your bounce queue runner isn't running
as a possible reason for why these files are piling up there.
i do have the qrunner on but which one is the "bou
> strings config.pck | grep wang
this helped. found 'johnwang @aabdc.com'... took it out with withlist...
isn't mailman supposed to check for stuff like that when mass subscribing?
this was from a mass subscription
thanks for the help... now things a back to normal...
---
> Are you saying that the above returns an empty list?? How can that be?
no, no... there are all there - about 1600 or so... but the john guy
isn't there...
i was just mentioning that i used the withlist as one way to delete the
john guy. i was just trying to add that address and delete it a fe
> Because the method which is used to remove the member is more general
> than that.
aha... ok.
>
> It appears something is messed up in the lists config.pck or perhaps
> there is a transparent character or something similar in the actual
> member address.
right. but grep didn't find it either
and this - executed in the directory of the aaac list:
who cares if s/he is a member - just get it out... why would you need to
assertIsMember?!? doesn't make sense
[~/aaac]# grep -rl [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
[~/aaac]# ../../bin/remove_members -a -n -N aaac
Traceback (most recent call last):
Fil
can somebody explain this please?... thanks
# ./remove_members -n -N aaac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# ./remove_members -a -n -N aaac
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./remove_members", line 186, in ?
main()
File "./remove_members", line 1
right... sorry... thanks...
> In a flurry of recycled electrons, kalin mintchev wrote:
>
>> in the 2.0 version i had before in the Privacy options there was a
>> setting for every single message to be approved - doesn't matter if the
>> member was new or not
hi all...
i just upgraded to 2.1.5...
in the 2.0 version i had before in the Privacy options there was a
setting for every single message to be approved - doesn't matter if the
member was new or not. now i can't find this... i see that there is a way
to turn that behavior for posts per me
hi all...
every time i try to send mail to a new list i get this messages in the
maillog. the message is not sent to the list and there isn't anything
pending approval...
any idea why? thanks...
this is in the maillog:
Apr 26 06:26:26 me sendmail[9131]: j3QAQQ1m009130:
to="|/usr/local/mai
> Most of those kinds of messages, on my lists, and I have over 60, are
> spam. You can set Mailman to discard all "held" messages, so you won't
> ever see them. They will also discard member posts from different
> addresses, etc., but this may be a small price to pay for not having to go
> thro
>
> jc
ok. in my first post i mentioned that this is mailman version 2.0.13.
those options don't exist there... but thanks...
>
>
--
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-
> Those messages aren't approved -- they're held.
ok, Brad. thanks. sure. they are held. held for approval. they are not
"approved". true.
are they from subscribed members? some. most are not.
but the setting says members_postings_only = 'yes' (ONLY!)
ok.
but there are about 60-70% mess
> Yes, this means that I (or a moderator) needs to read through the
> held queue and rescue any stray messages, but it only takes a few
> minutes a day.
>
> I think holding questionable messages is the best default because it
> allows the list-owner to remedy the situation. If the default was to
>
> On Apr 19, 2005, at 3:42 PM, kalin mintchev wrote:
>> right. but.. if they are not on the list they should not be approved - i
>> mean the posting is allowed ONLY to members (member_posting_only) so why
>> is mailman holding messages for approval that's not
> Because they're not on the list, their posts are held for moderation,
hence the notification.
right. but.. if they are not on the list they should not be approved - i
mean the posting is allowed ONLY to members (member_posting_only) so why
is mailman holding messages for approval that's not co
hi...
mailman version 2.0.13
Restrict posting privilege to list members? - yes.
i get a lot of messages to go to the Administrative requests page to
aprove messages that are from people who are NOT on the list at all.
what's up with that?
--
thanks Karl..
i think it was the subscribe/unsubscribe option. it was writing to many
emails. now adding is quick
thanks...
> "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> 7
> "kalin mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 7 hours now and counting... am i the only one on this list?!
>
> No, I think it just means no on has an answer for you.
>
> Have you tried putting some debugging prints into the code or
> anything?
7 hours now and counting... am i the only one on this list?!
> uhhh... it's going close to 5 1/2 hours now! i need this list to be
> operational today! what's the big deal with reading 1 lines of email
> addresses. i would have read them by now a few dozen times.
> what's up with add_member
uhhh... it's going close to 5 1/2 hours now! i need this list to be
operational today! what's the big deal with reading 1 lines of email
addresses. i would have read them by now a few dozen times.
what's up with add_members?!?
> hi all...
>
> i have a mailman version 2.0.13 running on an old
hi all...
i have a mailman version 2.0.13 running on an older box - rh 7.1 and i had
to replace the members of a list. so i removed all. this took about 1 1/2
hours to finish and now i'm importing the members back in - they are about
10 000. it has been going on for about 3 hours.
this is how i
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Kalin Mintchev wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Stonewall Ballard wrote:
> >
> > > How about using the "Mass Subscription" section under "Membership
> > > Management" on t
limitations on how many you can do at
once?... some of those old lists have 4000 - 5000 subscribers...
>
> On 9/25/02 3:19 PM, "Kalin Mintchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > hi all,
> >
> > i had to upgrade to mailman from another list ser
hi all,
i had to upgrade to mailman from another list server (listar). listar uses
a text file for each list called dist that has all the email addresses
subscribed to that list to send the messages out to them. it looks like
this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
etc...
..
how can i po
40 matches
Mail list logo
