Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderated list: admin vs moderator

2002-02-21 Thread jgo
> At Wed, 2002-02-20 12:32:06 -0800 John W Baxter wrote: >> At 2002-02-20 13:16 -0500, Paul-Catalin Oros wrote: >> Implicitly approved people. I just tested this and it works fine. > Implicitly approved people (addresses) can be forged. Easily. > Over on the developer list, I recently suggeste

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderated list: admin vs moderator

2002-02-21 Thread jgo
> At 2002-02-20 13:16:37 -0500 Paul-Catalin Oros wrote: >> On Wed, 2002-02-20, Marcel Hicking wrote: >> I'd like to have a moderated (here: announcements only) >> list where I have an additional admin ("moderator") who >> would be allowed nothing but approve or reject postings >> (which usually wo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Changing the list password (when you do notknow it)

2002-02-14 Thread jgo
> At 2002-02-14 09:43:54 +0100 Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> On Wed, 2002 Feb 13 at 15:04:25 -0800, Dan Mick wrote: >>> How can I change the list password when I forgot (actually never knew) >> This, too, is answered in the FAQ. > No, the FAQ http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/faq.html> does > n

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request

2002-02-04 Thread jgo
> Sun, 2002-02-03 09:37:51 +0100 Matthias Jaenichen wrote: > even if you use TEXT, but have nonstandard chars in the text/subject like > "äöü" the archives become unreadable. > I think the problem here is that the format it is stored in the archives is > the only "transportable" one. If we strip

Re: [Mailman-Users] No footer for HTML messages

2002-01-29 Thread jgo
> Fri, 2002-01-25 19:03:53 -0500 David Pierron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I installed Mailman 2.0.8 and have noticed that it doesn't put the list > footer on messages in HTML format... > > I looked on SourceForge to see if the bug was posted and a possible > resolution, but didn't see anything in Bugs

[Mailman-Users] smrsh

2002-01-10 Thread jgo
There have been a number of questions on this... and answers, but I don't quite see an answer that works... yet. I'm getting the dreaded smrsh error. smrsh: wrapper not available for sendmail programs 554 5.0.0 "|/Users/mailman/Documents/mailman/bin/mail/wrapper post third"... Service unavailable

[Mailman-Users] Re: sendmail + mailman

2002-01-10 Thread jgo
> At 2002-01-08 11:39:27 -0500 "Daniel J. Luke" wrote: >> On Tue, 2002 Jan 08 at 00:02:58 -0800, jgo wrote: >> Anyone know of likely things that could be going wrong, here? > > By default, sendmail on OS X doesn't use the alias file (it uses NetInfo). > &

[Mailman-Users] (no subject)

2001-12-28 Thread jgo
> Kevin Brouelette 2001-12-27 18:28:50 -0800 wrote: >> Drama Share wrote: >> Can you tell me if, (and if so where), a subscriber can be blocked, >> other than through just using the moderate features. > If you are using Sendmail you may block them before they > even get handed off to mailman. >

[Mailman-Users] /etc/aliases & 550 User unknown?

2001-12-19 Thread jgo
OK I was experience the black hole effect with postings to the list; now I'm getting bounces. /etc/aliases looks like this mailman: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailman-owner: mailman ## listname mailing list ## created: 2001-11-21 mailman listname: "|/Users/mailman/Documents/mailman/bin/mail/wrapper post

Re: [Mailman-Users] Pending_subscriptions.db

2001-12-03 Thread jgo
> "Lynn, Michael (DCS)" 2001-12-01 11:06:09 -0500 >> Jon Carnes 2001-12-01 11:02 wrote: >>> On 2001-12-01 10:24, Lynn, Michael (DCS) wrote: >>> I implemented Mailman yesterday and had some problems with Sendmail >>> config. I believe I have resolved those problems and how I have >>> a large pendi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Bouncing and bouncing

2001-12-03 Thread jgo
> FOund out what it is. > Please make sure your relaying is enabled for your > localhost.localdomain. and also make sure your relaying > is enabled for 127.0.0.1 > Check it out in the /etc/mail/access file Don't have one of those. What creates it? Is it only used by a particular MTA? (Gotta

Re: [Mailman-Users] not being told of pending administrativerequests

2001-11-26 Thread jgo
> Peter Jay Salzman at 2001-11-21 09:03:02 -0800 wrote: > 1. user subscribes to list > 2. user gets confirmation notice > 3. user replies to confirmation notice > 4. i get no email that there's a pending request waiting for me > the only way to learn of the pending request is to visit the admin p

RE: [Mailman-Users] Email Subscription

2001-11-20 Thread jgo
> sure, just send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with the subject "subscribe" And does the sysadmin have to have set up a username listname-request for this to work? Otherwise, wouldn't it just get rejected with user not found or some such? [Taking great glee in adding spamsters to the list in m

Re: [Mailman-Users] New user

2001-11-08 Thread jgo
> I just set up my first mailing list and I'm a bit > confused about one thing. At the moment any mail > sent to the list waits for me to approve it. Can > I set it up so that all the postings from the > members go straight to the other list members > without me being involved? Here's the way I

Re: [Mailman-Users] why can't people see my lists?

2001-11-01 Thread jgo
> Jon Carnes wrote: >> 2001-10-31 10:17:00 -0800 J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Wed, 2001-10-31 11:31:24 -0500 Joshua S Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>wrote: > the assumtion that the lists will be found off the home > directory in "lists/". >>> http://www.mysql.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mass "un"-subscription

2001-11-01 Thread jgo
> "Camille K. Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 2001-10-31 13:05:51 -0500 > Is there a way to do a mass unsubscription or would > I have to individually unsubscribe each user? .../bin/remove_members John G. Otto, Eagle Scout, Knight, Cybernetic Praxeologist Existence, Consciousness, Identity, Lif

Re: [Mailman-Users] Unsubscribing users

2001-10-22 Thread jgo
> Detlef Neubauer 2001-10-19 16:28:51 +0200 wrote: >> "Clean Air" wrote: >> Is there a way to mass-UNsubscribe users from the system? >> I handle at least 50 unsubscribe requests a week, and >> it's not fun to do it one at a time. > ~/bin/remove_members But why should one need to handle so many

[Mailman-Users] TFM & black hole syndrome

2001-10-16 Thread jgo
> I really don't think RFTM is rude -- it's reality. > If more people did it there'd definitely be less general > confusion and that's, in fact, what the docs are for > -- issues such as this. Yah, the trick these days is figuring out which manual. With mailman, we have mailman itself, python, se

[Mailman-Users] Re: install on OS X

2001-10-06 Thread jgo
Thanks to Joe, Greg & David. Changing the name of the python executable back from the recommended python.exe to python let the mailman installation & checks work. (Sorry for the double post; a bounce message made me think it hadn't gotten posted the first time.) Now, I'm looking at security issu

[Mailman-Users] installing on OS X

2001-10-05 Thread jgo
I'm trying to install on OS X (10.1) and am getting a complaint about python not existing... but... ./configure --prefix=/Users/mailman/Documents --exec- prefix=/Users/mailman/Documents/bin --with-var- prefix=/Users/mailman/Documents/mutable --with- python=/usr/local/bin/python.exe Compiling