Sorry, I mis-typed, I meant mm_cfg.py. Mark's previous reply explained
the problem.
thanks,
douglas
Dragon wrote:
> douglas repetto wrote:
>
>> I found the problem. The address was defined correctly in mm_config.py,
>> but for some reason it was truncated in Defa
Thanks for the explanation, Mark. I made the suggested changes to
mm_cfg.py. I'll let you know if there is any additional strangeness...
best,
douglas
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> douglas repetto wrote:
>> I found the problem. The address was defined correctly in mm_config.py,
>>
ed MM and am monitoring our logs. So far
I don't see any more errors.
thanks,
douglas
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> douglas repetto wrote:
>> We've been getting many many strange mailman-bounces. It seems that
>> somewhere the mailman-bounces address is mis-configured. It shoul
Hello,
We've been getting many many strange mailman-bounces. It seems that
somewhere the mailman-bounces address is mis-configured. It should be
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but mail seems to be sent as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note missing "u"). That's causing
bounces to bounce all over the place...in our mail
ilman problem at all.
Thanks,
douglas
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> douglas repetto wrote:
>> Partially answering my own question: I've just realized that when the
>> system was copied over some essential links were replaced by normal
>> files. So I ended up with both a /priv
ad me to the problem.
best,
douglas
douglas repetto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Our server recently had hard drive problems, and the system was copied
> to another drive where it seems to be more or less happy.
>
> But we're having a strange Mailman problem (Mailman 2.1.5 on
Hello,
Our server recently had hard drive problems, and the system was copied
to another drive where it seems to be more or less happy.
But we're having a strange Mailman problem (Mailman 2.1.5 on OSX Server
10.4.10): the lists are running, mail is being delivered, but no
archiving is taking
hi,
i'm getting ready to move a largish (~1400 subscribers) from majordomo
to mailman. i've been running a bunch of mailman lists for a while now,
and they're all fine. but this particular list has a funny setup, and
i'm not sure if it can be duplicated under mailman.
the list has two modes,