Re: [Mailman-Users] DKIM best practise

2015-06-21 Thread Yasir Assam
On 22/06/2015 1:58 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > As Mark already said, according to the standards it is correct and > good practice to add a DKIM signature to every message you process > outside of the MTA and then reinject into the Internet mail system. > In more friendly terms, if you simply

Re: [Mailman-Users] DKIM best practise

2015-06-21 Thread Yasir Assam
ark Sapiro wrote: > On 06/20/2015 06:39 PM, Yasir Assam wrote: >> Is there any way I can get hotmail to reply to the list when the From: >> header is munged? Is munging considered bad form (when not mitigating >> DMARC reject policies)? > > It may not have been clear from my

Re: [Mailman-Users] DKIM best practise

2015-06-21 Thread Yasir Assam
Many thanks for your response Mark. Comments below. On 22/06/2015 1:46 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 06/20/2015 06:39 PM, Yasir Assam wrote: >> I'm using mailman 2.1.18 on Debian Jessie with exim4. I have full >> personlisation and verp turned on. >> >> What shou

[Mailman-Users] DKIM best practise

2015-06-21 Thread Yasir Assam
I have a list which all subscribers can post to. I'm using mailman 2.1.18 on Debian Jessie with exim4. I have full personlisation and verp turned on. What should I do about DKIM? At the moment I preserve the original poster's DKIM header and my list's MTA also adds DKIM to all outgoing mail. If