Re: [Mailman-Users] Automatic subscription based on e-mail subject

2019-02-02 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 02 February 2019, Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users wrote: > I feel like Mailman's "Topic" feature is under utilized.  :-/ Agreed! Oddly none of the 'techie' lists I have ever been on enable this feature. Couple of critter lists that started on Listserve and moved to Mailman do. First l

Re: [Mailman-Users] cause of bounces

2017-10-19 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 19 October 2017, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > As Mark says, they should use an @sysadmins.irs.gov address or > something like that, which would have its own p=none policy.  Note > that this has been already standard practice at Yahoo! (!), AOL (!!), > LinkedIn, and several banks that pa

Re: [Mailman-Users] Find a smtp server to send out emails

2016-12-07 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 07 December 2016, Dominik Hoffmann wrote: > Ever since my ISP, Verizon, quit relaying email messages from addresses > not ending in @verizon.net, I have been exploring SMTP alternatives. I > haven't come to a conclusion, but I found an interesting list at > > https://www.formget.com/sm

Re: [Mailman-Users] Why do some get digests as a series of attachments?

2016-09-03 Thread William Bagwell
On Friday 02 September 2016, Richard Johnson wrote: > This is strange. One of my list users gets digest messages as a series of > attachments, while all other users receive digests as all text, with the > messages one after the other. > > The person who gets the attachments has a Cox.net address.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove individual msgs from archive

2016-06-15 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 15 June 2016, John Poltorak wrote: > Is it possible via the admin interface to remove individual msgs from an > archive? > > There is always the chance that something inappropriate gets posted and > isn't immediately spotted. Or even if it is spotted straight after it has > been posted

Re: [Mailman-Users] Message may contain ... administrivia?

2015-10-01 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 01 October 2015, Bryan Blackwell wrote: > Probably just as well to turn them off, most people use the web interface > nowadays and have for some time. Very long time for some of us, almost got kicked off of a mailing list about 15 years ago when I discovered List Serve had added a web

Re: [Mailman-Users] What would your dream Mailman web interface look like?

2015-04-08 Thread William Bagwell
On Monday 06 April 2015, JB wrote: > Ive been gathering that based on the research I have been doing.  I am > REALLY looking forward to the new version.  As soon as it is out I will > have to put in a feature request to the cPanle folks to make the upgrade > ASAP.  As an FYI, they are tad behind th

Re: [Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing list

2015-03-22 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 21 March 2015, Larry Kuenning wrote: > Settable by which user?  The sender or the recipient? Recipient of course, sender has no way of knowing what the recipient prefers. > And wouldn't a default of removing all but one level of quoted text make > nonsense of some posts?  E.g. in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] The "right" way to reply to a mailing list

2015-03-21 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 21 March 2015, Al Black wrote: > Although the ideal solution is obviously users changing their behaviour > and or MUAs, I've wondered whether an "auto-trim" function within mailman > would make sense (for digest users...)   Yes! For every one, not just digest users. And it should defau

Re: [Mailman-Users] Internet Message Format: Identification Fields

2014-06-23 Thread William Bagwell
On Monday 23 June 2014, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Your choice is clear to me. If you don't like the way Gmail handles your > list posts, subscribe and post from a non-gmail address. Mark, off topic for *this* list though you might want to add this to the FAQ? willi, some web hosting servers will allow

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can Mailman be installed on a free python webhost?

2013-12-02 Thread William Bagwell
On Monday 02 December 2013, R. Sheng-Chieh Cheng wrote: > With all the hack and permission's problem, I decided not to try to > install Mailman anywhere. I am not a geek and know no python, so I am not > going to start. Not free, but if you can afford $35 per year. Do not mind Mailman via cPanel

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > No, by definition it's a nasty feature, as it involves nonconformance > to RFC 5322. How so? I see two places in section 3.6.4. that suggest otherwise. " A message identifier pertains to exactly one version of a particular message; subs

Re: [Mailman-Users] receive your own posts problem

2013-04-11 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 11 April 2013, Joseph Brennan wrote: > The solution, or workaround I would say, is to change the Message-ID. > Possibly, a milter could do this on the way in on the Mailman host. Maybe > add a fixed string to what's already there. > > However this might have some impact on non Gmail use

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman hosting needed

2013-01-27 Thread William Bagwell
On Sunday 27 January 2013, Ed Kasky wrote: > I just did exactly what you are doing for the same reasons... > > I moved everything over to Asmallorange and so far I have been very happy. Long time ASO customer... They have a strict 1,000 emails per hour limit so a discussion list with 250 members

Re: [Mailman-Users] Gmail "features"

2012-08-09 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Lucio Crusca wrote: > I'd only like to slap gmail in the face if I could, by > working around their wonderful feature, just for the taste of feeling > smarter than they pretend to be. All in all, what is hacking about if > not that? Please do! Gmail user only because my

Re: [Mailman-Users] Cannot set digest mode via URL

2010-08-28 Thread William Bagwell
On Saturday 28 August 2010, Brad Knowles wrote: > Are you sure it's 2.1.13, and not something like 2.1.11-cp3?  In all > the versions I've ever seen cPanel release, they've always included a > dash and then their internal version identifier for their modified > code. I can confirm that a cPanel Ma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Gmane ?

2010-01-21 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 20 January 2010, William Bagwell wrote: > On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > John Fitzsimons wrote: > > >Private archive file not found > > > > It translates to > > > > http://mydomain/mailman/private/mymailinglist/

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Gmane ?

2010-01-21 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 21 January 2010, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > The only control you have is to use Mailman filters on incoming posts. > Until somebody tells us what headers Gmane provides to identify > itself, we can only guess at what might work. X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Seems to be th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and Gmane ?

2010-01-20 Thread William Bagwell
On Wednesday 20 January 2010, Mark Sapiro wrote: > John Fitzsimons wrote: > >Private archive file not found > > It translates to > > http://mydomain/mailman/private/mymailinglist/mymailinglist.mbox/mymail >inglist.mbox > > where mydomain is your host name and mymailinglist is the cPanel list > nam

Re: [Mailman-Users] Removing archives query.

2010-01-10 Thread William Bagwell
On Sunday 10 January 2010, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > snip > > I should explain why I believe *this* feature doesn't really benefit > Mailman itself. It requires destroying data, on behalf of people who > almost by definition don't know exactly what they're doing. In some > cases, doing this pr

Re: [Mailman-Users] List is too moderated. :-(

2010-01-07 Thread William Bagwell
On Thursday 07 January 2010, John Fitzsimons wrote: > Okay, I think I have messed up somewhere. Using version 2.1.11.cp3 > I have setup new member applications to require approval. To avoid > just anyone joining the list. > > That works fine. I get an email to allow/disallow them as subscribers. >