Re: [Mailman-Users] Assistance with altering reply-to behaviours and DMARC

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:10:53AM -0500, Barry S. Finkel wrote: > On 8/28/2015 3:03 AM, Will Yardley wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >> Mark writes: > >> > First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Assistance with altering reply-to behaviours and DMARC

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 01:37:18PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark writes: > > First, apologies if this has been discussed before. I run a number > > of mailman lists on a Centos 6 platform and mailman 2.1.12-25. This > > version was updated in July as follows: > > https://rhn.redhat.

Re: [Mailman-Users] list subscription spammers

ia loop: # for LIST in `./list_lists -b` ; do ./withlist -r set_banlist $LIST ; done # Obviously, the problem becomes a bit more complex if we want to adjust # the existing rule, vs. adding a new one; then we'd have to track the # item # within the list, and modify that item (this also shouldn'

Re: [Mailman-Users] need assistance upgrading Mailman

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:32:04PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > On August 24, 2015 12:44:02 PM PDT, Nina Nicholson > > wrote: > > >Andrew - I am using Plesk, and Mailman does interface with it. > > > > According to the FAQ at > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] list subscription spammers

And, self-followup, I had looked on list.org before, but hadn't checked the archives, so seems clear that the behavior is common. Running the RHEL5 Mailman currently (2.1.9) so still don't have the SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET feature yet. Mostly curious about the motivation behind this - what do these b

[Mailman-Users] list subscription spammers

I'm seeing massive numbers of subscription lists to various lists we host (including multiple requests to the same list). These are submitted via a distributed network of hosts, presumably botnet victims / open proxies. The requests are from foo+[0-9]{9}@gmail.com e.g., foo+55216394@ where foo

[Mailman-Users] .psv files in /var/spool/mailman/in 2.1.9

I found some .psv files in /var/spool/mailman/in/ (RHEL 5 Mailman package; 2.1.9). That seems to be too early for the stuff mentioned here (and I don't see those options in Defaults.py) https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2009-June/066395.html Is it safe to remove old .psv files in thi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Redacted Email Address in Feedback Loop

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 04:55:52PM -0700, Peter Knowles wrote: > What is the best way to deal with feedback loop messages where the provider > has redacted the email address of the party who filed the complaint? I haven't looked at a FBL message for a while, but most of the ones I've seen didn't

[Mailman-Users] non-interactive newlist, but send notification

Looking at the code, I think I know the answer already, but is there any way (with Mailman 2.1.9) to send a notification to the list owner when a list is created, but do it in non-interactive mode? Right now, you have to use '-q' to avoid hitting enter, but then no notification to the list-owner i

Re: [Mailman-Users] odd address confirmation spam

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:31:03PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Will Yardley : > > It seems someone is trying to forge-subscribe certain addresses (mostly > > AOL / Yahoo / Gmail etc. addresses) on our Mailman install. > > Which version of mailman is that? 2.1.9. And y

[Mailman-Users] odd address confirmation spam

It seems someone is trying to forge-subscribe certain addresses (mostly AOL / Yahoo / Gmail etc. addresses) on our Mailman install. For example, (slightly sanitized, though the IP address is the real one): [19/Jul/2013:09:49:17 -0700] 137.117.103.83 TLSv1 RC4-SHA "GET /mailman/subscribe/listname

Re: [Mailman-Users] Non-member posting to the list

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:03:32PM -0200, Rodrigo Abrantes Antunes wrote: > In my case, I found that the return-path header is the address of the > original sender, so how could I add a rule in mailman to deny posts with > return-path's address that are not members? The envelope-sender can also be

Re: [Mailman-Users] listhost vs hostname vs host_name

Mark Sapiro wrote: Will wrote: so we have an automated setup between a CMS forum and mailman to create lists, having a little confusion about what values to pass config_list trying to understand what these three values govern: listhost vs hostname vs host_name See the FAQ at <h

[Mailman-Users] listhost vs hostname vs host_name

Hi - so we have an automated setup between a CMS forum and mailman to create lists, having a little confusion about what values to pass config_list trying to understand what these three values govern: listhost vs hostname vs host_name right now we set -e emailhost via newlist, this has resu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection refused') errors

failure at midnight last night). --Will > -Original Message- > From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:22 AM > To: Will Nordmeyer; mailman-users@python.org > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection &g

[Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: (111, 'Connection refused') errors

e tried changing the SMTPHOST to my local server name, and the actual IP address for the server. /etc/access has a RELAY command for 127.0.0.1 and all IPs assigned to the server. Any other suggestions - I've got a client who needs to get an email out to the list asap. --Will --

[Mailman-Users] Migrating to new server...

each list. I don't have/can't find any config.db files within the mailman system. How bad is that? --Will -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http:/

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to enable TRACEBACK for mailman "bug" errors?

On 11/7/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > will trillich wrote: > >how do we ENABLE (uninhibit) the display of traceback in the web-page > >error message? > > The traceback and associated error info should be in Mailman's 'error' i agree, it

Re: [Mailman-Users] how to enable TRACEBACK for mailman "bug" errors?

On 11/7/06, will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/7/06, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > will trillich wrote: > > >how do we ENABLE (uninhibit) the display of traceback in the web-page > > >error message? > > > > The traceba

[Mailman-Users] how to enable TRACEBACK for mailman "bug" errors?

are having troubles tracking down the snags. all pointers welcome. thanks! -- will trillich "If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do and how to do it." -- A. Lincoln -- Mailman-Users

[Mailman-Users] No such list

I remove them? Thanks for any help you can offer. :) -Will -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http:/

Re: [Mailman-Users] changing hostname of web interface page

Thank you, that fixed it. :) A second question, if I may. Is there a way to only allow some users to send messages to the list? So the rest can only receive (seems like this would be useful for an announcement list). Hope that's not a stupid question. Thanks for the quick reply. =) -Wil

[Mailman-Users] changing hostname of web interface page

list prefers for email." part. This didn't seem to change anything, though. :( Thanks! -Will -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- absolute urls, stored WITH THE LIST

g either the apache daemon or the mailman daemon to have the server setting. i'm feeling much better now. :) probably drove Richard to drink. -- will trillich "Their is five errers in this sentance." -- Mailman-Users mailing lis

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- absolute links are per LIST, not per SERVER -- SOLVED

and for putting up with my inane ignorance! i'll go away now and leave you to get back to more intelligent questions. :) -- will trillich "Their is five errers in this sentance." -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Use

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- web interface uses absolute urls... to elsewhere

my original missive should've been more thorough. i can see that now. :) On 5/9/06, Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9 May 2006, at 04:16, will trillich wrote: > > On 5/8/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Check your setting i

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- web interface uses absolute urls... to elsewhere

3Dfaq04.027.htp > > > > > e.g. site for mail is 'mail.myexample.not'. that's where the MX > > points for smtp, > > and that's where webmail will be hosted for user pick-up (or imaps > > or pop3s). > > to administer this puppy, we've got

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- web interface uses absolute urls... to elsewhere

On 5/8/06, Patrick Bogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/7/06, will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > any ideas? > > Check your setting in DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN. See FAQ 4.29: > > http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq04.029.htp thank

[Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- web interface uses absolute urls... to elsewhere

after many, many iterations and googling left and right, we've finally made some progress on our email setup -- but mailman's web interface keeps generating absolute links off-site! including the form submits... not good! - debian (testing/unstable) - exim4-daemon-heavy (4.61-1 via apt-get) - mail

[Mailman-Users] mailman (+vexim +exim) -- web interface uses absolute urls... to elsewhere

recompiled from the .py files.] we ran 'hostname site.name' to fix it in ram, and then restarted mailman, exim, and apache. no good. we reset /etc/hostname and rebooted the computer, no good. any ideas? -- will trillich "Their is five errers in this sentance."

[Mailman-Users] Mailman isn't working: see /var/log/mailman/post

06 (23519) post to test from [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=2164, message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2 failures -- Will Twomey http://UnhandledExceptions.com -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/m

[Mailman-Users] Mass Subscription Problem

instead of an invitation, turned off welcome emails, no list administrator notification). When I click submit changes, I am put right back at the Mass Subscription page, and no addresses have been subscribed. Any suggestions? --Will -- Mailman

[Mailman-Users] Problem with cgi-bin files

24 Aug 25 12:56 cgi-bin -> /usr/lib/cgi-bin/mailman The files in that directory all have the following permissions -rwxr-sr-x 1 root list 6276 May 28 06:54 admin I'm confused why some pages load fine, and others do not. Does anyone know o

[Mailman-Users] Additional Subscription options

Hi, I'm doing some additional design for a client's website. They have a PHP based guestbook and want an option that will subscribe the user to their mailing list. I'm having difficulty doing the actual subscription. I tried tweaking add_members to allow a commandline param

[Mailman-Users] Moderator not receiving notifications

Hi, I've got a list where the moderator is not receiving list submission notifications. Any suggestions? -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: error when running "arch"

On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 02:41:16PM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote: > On Sep 30, 2004, at 03:16, Will Yardley wrote: > > Anything further I can do to debug this? Any idea what the > > "MemoryError" refers to? > How large are your archives? The mbox file is about 5

[Mailman-Users] Re: error when running "arch"

On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:25:37AM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > Should I file a bug about this (that the error isn't more specific)? > It would be much more helpful if this said "Cannot write to > /var/spool/mailman/lists/nord-modular" or something rather than > "

[Mailman-Users] error when running "arch"

I got the following error when rebuilding archives for a list (OpenBSD Mailman 2.1.5 installed from OpenBSD ports. It turned out the actual problem was a permissions problem on /var/spool/mailman/lists/[listname] (it was owned by root:_mailman instead of _mailman:_mailman). Should I file a bug abou

[Mailman-Users] Re: couple quick questions - mailman on obsd

On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 10:18:55AM +0900, Jim Tittsler wrote: > On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 04:57:50PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > > add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST) > > > > yet messages that are sent out still reference localhost.my.domain. > D

[Mailman-Users] couple quick questions - mailman on obsd

So I installed Mailman from ports on OpenBSD 3.5, and added the following to mm_cfg.py after "from Defaults import *" DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'mailman.code404.com' DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'mailman.code404.com' add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST) yet messages that are sent out still refe

[Mailman-Users] New Lists not being displayed

n.com/mailman/listinfo/lista and can access it, but when I go to www.domain.com/mailman/listinfo it doesn't show as a list. The permissions have it set to be an advertised list on the server though. Any ideas? --Will -- Mailman-Users ma

[Mailman-Users] Re: 2.1.5 and htdig patches for 2.1.4 - SOLVED

Figured it out. I was stupid and copied over TOC_htsearch.html (the 2.1.1 version) to ~mailman/templates/site/en/. It had the old style htsearch information. Thanks, Will On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:48:05 -0700, Will Froning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone know if the htdig patch

[Mailman-Users] 2.1.5 and htdig patches for 2.1.4

Does anyone know if the htdig patches for 2.1.4 will work on 2.1.5 (FreeBSD ports does this)? I ask because I tried and it's not liking me so much... This morning I upgraded both python2.2 and Mailman2.1.1 to 2.3.4 and 2.1.5, respectively. Mailman works like a charm, but htdig integr

[Mailman-Users] Re: Removing "on behalf of"

On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 12:19:12PM +0200, Thomas Hochstein wrote: > "John S. Strock" schrieb: > > > How do I remove the "On behalf of" in the 'From' field? > > There *is* no "on behalf of" in the Fom:-field. You just have to use a > client that does not show it that way. This is just the way som

[Mailman-Users] Has anyone thought of using subject lines on their emails?

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:34:51PM -0400, PC Specialties Inc wrote: > Has anyone thought of numbering the attachments so they match the topic list ? -- "Since when is skepticism un-American? Dissent's not treason but they talk like it's the same..." (Sleater-Kinney - "Combat Rock") ---

[Mailman-Users] RE: Mass Add digest members

Change the default delivery mode to Digest in the "Digest Options" page, and then import the users from the Mass Sub page. Will -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-7470 (209)662-4725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing l

[Mailman-Users] Re: footers

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:43:05PM -0500, jsingh wrote: > When I send an attachement, why does the footer come as an attachement if I > use rich text or html format? what do I need to do for the footer to appear > normally at the end of the body of the message rather than as an > attachement. I'

[Mailman-Users] weird mailman hangs

I've been seeing some weird hangs with Mailman in the last few days. We have a large number of lists, running 2.1.4 w/ htdig patches. This is a system that's been running with no problems for quite a while (without any major changes that I'm aware of). In most cases, removing all lockfiles other t

[Mailman-Users] Senddigest error

.1 on FBSD 4.8 Thanks, Will --ERROR- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/mailman/cron/senddigests", line 94, in ? main() File "/usr/local/mailman/cron/senddigests", line 86, in main mlist.send_digest_now() File &q

[Mailman-Users] Re: Senddigest error

Found it. senddigests -l LISTNAME Thanks, Will On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:13:09 -0800 Will Froning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I came accross the below error today and I can't seem to find the > offending e-mail. I did a quick look over > ~/lists/LISTNAME/digest.mbox, not

[Mailman-Users] Re: Reply to list

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:45:16PM -0800, Mark Dadgar wrote: > On Feb 5, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Brad Knowles wrote: > > I can go back through the 90's, into the mid-80's if length of time > >is the important criteria here. I have multiple gigabytes of e-mail > >on my current system, and untold g

[Mailman-Users] Re: GnuPG Integration?

on/article_smime/sympasmime.html) I would also take a look at shibboleth: http://www.interhack.net/pubs/shibboleth/ I'm not totally sure this will do exactly what you want, but it might be worth looking at. -- "Since when is skepticism un-American? Dissent's not t

[Mailman-Users] Re: 2.1.2 with postfix(some progress)

On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 05:16:08PM -0800, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2004 14:27, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > > Installed 2.1.2 on Mandrake 9.1 with postfix 20031231. Install was > > by rpm from the mandrake site. Followed the readme.postfix. Got > > the web interface up and r

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailmanctl -s

On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:39:24PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote: > Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What do most folks do so that Mailman will restart when the system is > > restarted uncleanly? Could having the system's startup script (assuming > > a

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailmanctl -s

On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:16:04PM -0500, Todd wrote: > Will Yardley wrote: > > When mailmanctl is run with "-s" (supposedly kills stale locks), > > Mailman spits out the default usage summary, and then "No command > > given.". Same with "--stale

[Mailman-Users] mailmanctl -s

Still haven't gotten a response on this, other than the fact that other people have noticed the same thing (wrote to the list about it a long time back). When mailmanctl is run with "-s" (supposedly kills stale locks), Mailman spits out the default usage summary, and then "No command given.". Same

[Mailman-Users] Re: Wrapping long lines in Mailman

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:03:29AM -0800, Will Froning wrote: > I have Mailman 2.1.1 w/ htDig running on FreeBSD 4.8. I have a > particular user (read CIO) that never uses the Enter key when composing > messages. So besides making the archive just plain ugly with these > infinitel

Re: [Mailman-Users] Wrapping long lines in Mailman

ike the fmt option. It's done through aliases, so I can selectively turn it on/off. Will -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-7470 (209)662-4725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/m

[Mailman-Users] Re: Wrapping long lines in Mailman

> I've seen some people's solutions in the archives using fmt and piping > to mailmain, but that does work in FreeBSD (seems Solaris's fmt is > better). Flub... should be "doesn't work in FreeBSD" Thanks, Will -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)

[Mailman-Users] Wrapping long lines in Mailman

and a carriage return (from Mailman). I've seen some people's solutions in the archives using fmt and piping to mailmain, but that does work in FreeBSD (seems Solaris's fmt is better). Does anyone else have any solutions? Thanks, Will -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-747

Re: [Mailman-Users] personalization (was Re: mailman & AOL's "Client TOS notification")

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:55:43AM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > On Nov 4, 2003, at 10:52 AM, Will Yardley wrote: > > Do we *really* need this "feature" on the mailman-users list? Does > > anyone actually find it helpful? > god, yes. Please don't assume ever

[Mailman-Users] personalization (was Re: mailman & AOL's "Client TOS notification")

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:36:58AM -0800, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > On Nov 4, 2003, at 8:54 AM, Ricardo Kustner wrote: > > I wish I could do that: my current mailman setup doesn't put the > > user's address in the "To:" address and since those wonderful AOL > > reports only include the origina

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman & AOL's "Client TOS notification"

; > remove & block all AOL users :( > Yes, they are at risk. You had better find a way to unsubscribe those > folk. VERP is a good start. Realistically, though, the threshold is generally pretty high -- it takes a good amount of mail marked as spam before AOL will block you (although

[Mailman-Users] Re: Threading and In-Reply-To

On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:59:33PM -0600, McKeever Chris wrote: > I have noticed that the threading on our archive does not work, > looking through the Mailman Faq/Archive, I have learned that this is > typically caused by the In-Reply-To not being supported via the Mail > Client. Looking at the

[Mailman-Users] Re: AOL issue

sent from the internet. Effective immediately: AOL 220- may no longer accept connections from IP addresses which 220 have no reverse-DNS (PTR record) assigned. Will On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:06:04 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: Paul H Byerly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[Mailman-Users] Re: Mailman and Debian

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:54:58PM -0500, Pascal Blanchette wrote: > I was wondering if there was a reason why the only Mailman version available > as a stable debian package is version 2.0.11? > Version 2.1.3 is marked as unstable. Is the new version still in beta or is > it ready to be deploye

[Mailman-Users] Re: Hosting companies

On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:50:59PM -0600, Dale schibbelhut wrote: > My current hosting company does not want Mailman on their servers. > Other than that I am quite satisfied with their service. I am looking > for a company that will host lists using mailman software. Does > anyb

[Mailman-Users] Re: [spam] being added to subject

On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:06:45PM -0700, Mike Chambers wrote: > No. It is not spam (I double checked that). > > So the subject looks like this: > > [spam][listname]subject here More than likely, then, this is due to a spam filter that has nothing to do with Mailman. Are you sure that such a sp

[Mailman-Users] Re: [spam] being added to subject

On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:07:20PM -0700, Mike Chambers wrote: > I just set up mailman-2.1-8. Everything is working fine except it adds > "[spam]" to every single message to the list. > > I have looked through the admin, and the docs and cannot figure out how to > prevent this. Any suggestions?

[Mailman-Users] Re: Mail not getting through to AOL

On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:31:02AM -0400, Sean wrote: > You're best bet is to have your AOL users complain to AOL directly > about not getting their mail. I've been dealing with this for two > years and have got nowhere contact AOL. Their postmaster and anti-spam departments have gotten a lot mo

[Mailman-Users] Re: Clear Cache

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 08:25:00PM +, Hostmaster wrote: > On our maiden voyage, we were mass subscribing to our list when we > realized it was sending the subscription message for each address. We > decided we did not want this, so we stopped the MTA. Now, we have > lots of unsent messages i

[Mailman-Users] Re: not allowing mass-subscription (web interface)

On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0400, Jon Carnes wrote: > This would be a fairly simple hack to the source. You would simply grep > for the option you want to comment out and when you find it in the > source, comment it out. Then it won't appear in the web pages (that > would be for every li

[Mailman-Users] affecting "public" name of list

on of Mailman for each account or domain, and requiring unique listnames globally will also not work for our purposes. If not, consider this an RFE (I can submit one on the site if requested). If someone wanted to provide a patch for this (against 2.1.3), I might even be able to give them some money i

[Mailman-Users] not allowing mass-subscription (web interface)

Is there an option to disable mass-subscription from the web interface, so that users can't add non-confirmed addresses themselves? Is there an option to require re-confirmation for addresses added (I guess only allowing "invite" but not "subscribe" would take care of this. Lastly, is there a way

[Mailman-Users] Modify Email Transformation

Hello: I would like to change the tranformation of email addresses from "username at domain.com" to "username at domain dot com" like php.net. Is there one function in a particular file that performs the transformation? ++Pea

[Mailman-Users] Re: Sobig forces unsubscribes

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:01:18PM -0700, John W. Baxter wrote: > On 9/2/2003 16:34, "Will Yardley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, I think it's a good overall policy to reject any message > > that's not delivered - with any sort of filter based

[Mailman-Users] Re: Deleting Member from All Lists

00 > > Is there a way to delete a member from all lists - preferably from the > web interface? If not, can it be done via the command line? > > Thanks! > > --Warren (www.odnetwork.org) -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)

[Mailman-Users] Re: Sobig forces unsubscribes

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:05:51PM -0400, Rob Carlson wrote: > On Tuesday, Sep 2, 2003, at 19:59 US/Eastern, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > > > My list owners are getting Sobig files bounced to them through the > > > administrative addresses. One of their ISPs has decided to reject > > > those relayed

[Mailman-Users] Re: Sobig forces unsubscribes

e this. > She's asked her admins to change it to a 554 Service Unavailable > bounce, but I'm not even sure that will make a difference if my > machine keeps trying to send them. Is there a simple way I haven't > thought of to strip out the Sobig posts to the list owners? Whi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Footer ?

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:58:22PM -0700, jsmith wrote: [ Stop top posting! ] > > If you've really tried sending mail from all these other mailers, why > > does THIS message have the footer as part of the message body and not as > > an attachment? > I have asked that question so many times here a

[Mailman-Users] Re: mail server recommendations?

look at, but > don't quote me on that as I'm no authority :-) I will third the suggestion to check out Postfix. I've used it on both very large scale systems (multiple mail machines, 30k+ users per cluster of machines), as well as on my own workstations. It's easy to configur

[Mailman-Users] Re: Footer ?

On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:00:53PM -0700, jsmith wrote: [ Two layers of miserable Lookout! TOFU corrected ] > > > My "Footers" are being sent to our mailing list participants as > > > "Attachments" rather than being inserted into the message text. > > > > > > Please advise what I setup incorrect

[Mailman-Users] Re: archive clean-up?

stration page. -thanks! > > -- > Tim Tyler > Network Manager - Beloit College > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-7470 (209)662-4725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTE

[Mailman-Users] Re: non-member bounces

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 06:19:38PM -0400, Clay Stuckey wrote: > Is there a way to allow posts from all non members? I have 20 or so lists > for my company. I want to allow anyone to email any list even it they are > not a member. I am using this purely as a centrally managed group email > solution

[Mailman-Users] Re: Evolution, GPG,and mailman 2.1.2 - blank message bodies

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 01:01:09PM -0400, Jeremy Portzer wrote: > > Note: I've also heard that Outlook Express has a similar problem > reading GPG-signed emails with evolution's MIME-added signature, so this > isn't really uniquely an evolution problem. But Outlook Express handles > GPG pretty p

[Mailman-Users] include HTML in public pages

Hi, I'd like to include some kind of pointer in the public pages forms to outside HTML. I know that SSI won't work inside CGI, but is there in include tag for Mailman or Python that will point to my html header and footer files. I'll have a number of lists (as well as other pa

[Mailman-Users] Re: non-member bounces

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 06:19:38PM -0400, Clay Stuckey wrote: > Is there a way to allow posts from all non members? I have 20 or so lists > for my company. I want to allow anyone to email any list even it they are > not a member. I am using this purely as a centrally managed group email > solution

[Mailman-Users] Bad digest mesg

I just got the below message from Mailman. Is there any way to find out which message it's having problems with? FreeBSD 4.6.2 Mailman 2.1.1 w/ htdig Thanks, Will Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:00:03 -0700 (PDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) To: [EMAIL PROT

[Mailman-Users] Re: So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 07:51:44PM -0700, SysAdmin wrote: > I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it > stayed up and running. So don't use it. -- "Since when is skepticism un-American? Dissent's not treason but they talk like it's the same..." (Sleater-Kinney - "

[Mailman-Users] Re: Flat Threads when posting usingOutlook/Exchange clients

On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:56:59PM -0700, Roy Santos wrote: > I have seen a few postings regarding problems getting > flat threads while posting using Outlook clients. See > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03011.html. > But what I haven't seen is an answer on how or what > needs a

[Mailman-Users] Re: Starting qrunner for FreeBSD

On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:10:20AM +0200, Amardeo Sarma wrote: > I am a newbie and running Mailman 2.1.1 on FreeBSD 4.7 / VPSv2, which works > with the old technique of running qrunner every minute from cron. The INSTALL > instructions give some hints on how to start the qrunner daemon at startu

[Mailman-Users] Re: Red Hat 9 - Mailman not working out of the box

On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:59:04AM +1000, Peter Russell wrote: > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If > you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the message to > the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such > a cas

[Mailman-Users] Re: Commercial provider for Mailman 2.1?

d on, and while I can't give you a specific ETA on when 2.1 will be fully working, it should be fairly soon. You can email support@ if you're interested in being a candidate for early migration to 2.1 once it's setup. Will (DreamHost) -- "Since when is skepticism un-American?

[Mailman-Users] Re: Majordomo-style moderation

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:30:16AM +0400, Moscow School of Human Rights wrote: > In my opinion the only and very important trait of Mailman is > impossibility to moderate the lists in Majordomo style, by adding > "approved: password" line at the top of "technical" e-mail message and > then sendin

[Mailman-Users] possible bug with mail confirmation

I wrote earlier about some suggested improvements with the confirmation by mail function. Here's another thing - if you insert an 'Approved: ' string that's incorrect, the message is deleted (in a way that's unrecoverable, AFAICT). My suggestion is that you get an error message back instead, stati

[Mailman-Users] Re: Internal Domain Resolution

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:10:59PM -0500, Sullivan, John wrote: > Here is a chunk of the maillog file. > > > Mar 31 12:01:57 localhost sendmail[780]: h2SKs2Rg011995: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=2+20:07:55, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, > pri=6439538, relay=mail.majorleaguesoccer.com., ds

[Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:57:47PM -0500, Sullivan, John wrote: > OK - But how do I get lists.mlsnet.com to relay mail to the mlsnet.com > mail server. Subcribers from the mlsnet.com domain are not receiving > any news letters sent out from the lists.mlsnet.com server. I am > getting a connection

[Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record

all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will be delivered to > lists.mlsnet.com. If that server does not respond then the mail will be > queued up on your main mail server: mail.mlsnet.com > > This assumes that you can setup the other mail server to act as a > secondary. If not, then just leav

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.1 Traceback

Where do I send Tacebacks to? -developers? Thanks, Will -- Will Froning Unix Sys. Admin. (209)946-7470 (209)649-0098 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

[Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record

you're using Red Hat. I seem to recall that Red Hat's default config doesn't listen on external interfaces. There's an article on this in the FAQ. http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section5.html#5.3.1.3 Perhaps this will help? -- The Pope has said this war is wrong, that it is

  1   2   >