Re: [Mailman-Users] using mailman in our product

2001-03-08 Thread Teo de Hesselle
From memory, you can do whatever you like to GPL'd software as long as you dont redistribute it. If you need to redistribute it, you must also release the source code to people you sell it to. Yes, you're allowed to sell it, however it must be done under the GPL, which means that your customers ca

Re: [Mailman-Users] Altering Message Footer

2001-03-06 Thread Teo de Hesselle
It's in the headers of the message, as of mailman-2.0 and above. Check the headers of this message. "Harry L. Styron" wrote: > > Federal law will or does require information in mass mailings on how to > unsubscribe from lists. Can the footer in Mailman be altered to include > text to conform w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Help - "No such user here"

2001-03-06 Thread Teo de Hesselle
Andrew Pattison wrote: > > I get the error "no such user here" back in my email when I try to send mail > to the test list. I have done all the obvious stuff it says in all the > documentation I could find. Can anyone give me some pointers? I switched the > /etc/aliases hacking back on if this

Re: [Mailman-Users] changing EVERY member EMAIL ADDRESS?

2001-03-05 Thread Teo de Hesselle
Steven Boger wrote: > My company just changed its email address - our internal mailing lists - > totaling over 1000 email addresses need to changed to reflect this new > address. > > How would I do this? This is basically what I need to change: > old: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > new: [EMAIL PROTECT

[Mailman-Users] Incorrect Headers

2001-03-04 Thread Teo de Hesselle
It seems that for one of my lists' monthly password reminders, mailman is putting incorrect headers in, making it appear that the reminder is coming from a different list. The list whom this user is subscribed to is called 'researchnet', whereas the headers are claiming that it is coming from the

Re: [Mailman-Users] weekly digests?

2001-03-04 Thread Teo de Hesselle
Lee Samuel Finn wrote: > > Greetings: > > I have some lists that I want to force to come out as weekly - not daily > - digests. (This is for a weekly progress report distribution.) Is there > a way to adjust the digest frequency for some lists? > Have you tried editing the crontab so teh dig

Re: [Mailman-Users] Prob1: How to disble unsubscribe for some users

2001-03-04 Thread Teo de Hesselle
Nathan Grass wrote: > As to this being impossible, the mailman web interface > provides a very easy way to have mailman send you your > password and this is not something you can disable per > user. > So disable it. Perhaps at the httpd level (ie block particular URLs), if you want to do this

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.0beta6

2001-02-27 Thread Teo de Hesselle
You need to specify a regular expression, for example: .*\@voyager\.net will do what you thought *@voyager.net would do. This is because the . and @ have special meanings in regular expressions. Unfortunately you still need to manually reject all the non voyager addresses. Matt Holtz wrote: >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailling List

2001-02-25 Thread Teo de Hesselle
My lists work just fine, and all our users have "."'s in their email addresses, and we have both 1.0 and 2.0 installations of mailman. MAIL_CAR wrote: > > I own a webhosting company and use your software. I have a problem that > your mailing list doesnt let his name with "." in it > > e.g.

Re: [Mailman-Users] limiting max message size globally

2001-02-22 Thread Teo de Hesselle
do it in the MTA. "Erik S.E. Walum" wrote: > > Is there a way to limit the max limit on message size globally for all > lists? Were concerned about letting customers manage this veriable as it > can have extremely detrimentel effects when your installation becomes > quite large. Please respond t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Unwanted Body Content

2001-02-22 Thread Teo de Hesselle
Dan Mick wrote: > > > Why > > should they have to reconfigure their email client which they use > > happily with hundreds of people, where MIME is a blessing, > > It's a wart on email, and needs to be stopped. > > > in order to > > meet the needs of one mailing list they happen to be a member

Re: [Mailman-Users] qfiles directory

2001-02-20 Thread Teo de Hesselle
Dan Lowe wrote: > > > Well, this is a snippet of your SMTP transaction between Mailman and > Sendmail (localhost port 25). I don't know what you know about SMTP, but I > find it interesting that it seems to get a 450 response code back from > Sendmail rather than a 250. 400-series errors are

[Mailman-Users] qfiles directory

2001-02-14 Thread Teo de Hesselle
My question relates to the purpose of the qfiles directory... when a message is living in that directory, what does that mean? Does it mean mailman hasnt processed it at all, and is a sort of inbox, or is it for messages which cannot be delivered at the current time. Also, how many files would yo