nd bounce the mails right back to the sender,
but I'd rather not be that harsh. The sender is aware of the issue,
but everybody makes mistakes now and then :>
--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University | ICBM Address: 40.346525 -74
are a lot of people who love them and use
them, so don't throw in the towel because you think they're not
appreciated.
--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University | ICBM Address: 40.346525 -74.651285
126 Peyton Hall |&qu
thanks for all your work. It is not unappreciated :>
--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University | ICBM Address: 40.346525 -74.651285
126 Peyton Hall |"On my ship, the Rocinante, wheeling through
Princeton, NJ 08544 | the g
en
multiple programs (especially since Postfix is quite particular about
its environment), sometimes the ease of RPM isn't worth it.
--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
Princeton University | ICBM Address: 40.346525 -74.651285
126 Peyton Hall
L_HOST?
Or is that only used when the list is created for setting the initial
value for the "host name this list prefers for email"? If that's the
case I might just set it now so I don't forget later while creating
lists on the box.
TIA
---
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admi
d to rebuild the web
archives from, or would they also go with a rmlist? If they're wiped,
then the first suggestion (remove all users, require authorization to
join list), plus removing the aliases, would probably be best.
---
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Admin, Dept. of Astrophys
izes (have had my DSL dropped twice when
companies went under, and had to go back to good old dial-up), I doubt a
couple patches to Mailman would change the size that much. Plus, it already
requires Python, and last I checked that was pretty big :>
--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Adm
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Steve Huston wrote:
> Checking the patches on Sourceforge, I found where someone sent in a patch
> that adds the mlist.post_id number to the subject if it contains '%d'. While
> this may be the easiest way to do this, since it would also be searchabl
even be in the html source and
not displayed (META tag?) and htdig would get it, but I'd rather it be
viewable somehow.
If/when I get this nicely cleaned up and presentable I'll submit the patch to
SF.
--
Steve Huston - Unix Systems Administrator, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
Princ
ange was not quite right; good try but no cigar.:)
Tried it today, works like a champ. Thanks!
> At 23:41 21/01/2003, Steve Huston wrote:
> >Lastly, I'm a little confused by one way things fit together. Granted, it
> >works, but... Why does the htdig script make its resul
orks differently than I'm
thinking, but it seems more resource-effective to have the link point right to
the file instead of going through another cgi, when we know the location of
the file we're trying to get.
Please, call me an idiot, and explain why :>
--
Steve Huston - Unix S
11 matches
Mail list logo
