Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

2003-10-31 Thread Scott Lambert
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 12:59:24AM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 6:21 PM -0500 2003/10/31, Scott Lambert wrote: > > I haven't looked at the code yet, and probably won't (ENOTIME), but > > it almost sounds to me like it's not pruning it's list of handled >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

2003-10-31 Thread Scott Lambert
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:52:34PM -0500, Scott Lambert wrote: > Once I kill off the mailman queue runners and clean up the several lock > files for this mailing list, it runs just fine and manages to empty the > archive queue. Well, the above statement is not entirely accurate. It wa

Re: [Mailman-Users] Problem with archrunner using large %'s of cpu (read faq & archives)

2003-10-31 Thread Scott Lambert
mailman cron jobs were still stuck in the process list. Supposition: Maybe they were blocked by the list's lockfile? So, it seems that the archRunner process went off the deep end somewhere between two and three days ago. I have the htdig patches for 2.1.3 installed. Which might be ge

Re: [Mailman-Users] ban_list example?

2003-10-13 Thread Scott Lambert
knowing anything about mailman's use of these values: The "^.*something" regex is equivalent to just "something". "^.*" is useless, confusing and should never be used in a regex for the regex libraries with which I am familiar. -- Scott Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED