[Mailman-Users] mailman subscription feature

2004-06-11 Thread Saurav Pathak
confirmation. Is this a feature that is totally lacking? Does it require a lot of rewrite? I shall appreciate any help. Thanks, Saurav Saurav Pathak [Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 06:07:46PM -0400]: + Hi: + + For a list that requires both confirmation and approval for + subscription, I would

[Mailman-Users] customize list administrator mail

2004-06-08 Thread Saurav Pathak
Hi: For a list that requires both confirmation and approval for subscription, I would like to customize a message for the subscriber once he has confirmed and awaiting administrator approval. Where do I customize the message? My initial guess was the file ~mailman/templates/en/approve.txt but

[Mailman-Users] procmail and file permissions

2004-02-06 Thread Saurav Pathak
Hi all, I am using procmail to pre-process messages before they hit Mailman. I doing it the way it is suggested in the FAQ (spamassassin+mailman). I am unsure what the permissions and ownerships for the procmailrc should be. At the moment the file is world readable and owned by root.mailman. If

Re: [Mailman-Users] Changing post held message

2004-02-02 Thread Saurav Pathak
Thus spake Saurav Pathak: + Hi, + + I wish to change the post held message for only one of the mailing + list. How may I do that? If I changed the text in the file + (mailman directory)/templates/en/postheld.txt + I will have changed it for all mailing lists. Which I don't wa

[Mailman-Users] Changing post held message

2004-02-02 Thread Saurav Pathak
Hi, I wish to change the post held message for only one of the mailing list. How may I do that? If I changed the text in the file (mailman directory)/templates/en/postheld.txt I will have changed it for all mailing lists. Which I don't want to do. Also, I pre-process mails using procmail. Di

Re: [Mailman-Users] admin notifications for held messages

2003-10-10 Thread Saurav Pathak
Thus spake Richard Barrett: + Try changing the line in the patch from: + + DEFAULT_MODERATE_INC_BODY = Yes + + to: + + DEFAULT_MODERATE_INC_BODY = 1 + Hi Richard, That worked. Thanks. -- saurav -- Mailman-Users mailing list [

Re: [Mailman-Users] admin notifications for held messages

2003-10-09 Thread Saurav Pathak
be a patch in the next version. thanks, saurav Thus spake Saurav Pathak: + + + + Thus spake Richard Barrett: + + + As it stands, the patch has to be applied to the Mailman source + + distribution and there are only versions for MM 2.1.2 and MM 2.1.3 + + + + That said, it

Re: [Mailman-Users] admin notifications for held messages

2003-10-08 Thread Saurav Pathak
Thus spake Richard Barrett: + As it stands, the patch has to be applied to the Mailman source + distribution and there are only versions for MM 2.1.2 and MM 2.1.3 + + That said, it will probably work with earlier versions of MM 2.1 or can + be trivially adapted to work with them. The

[Mailman-Users] admin notifications for held messages

2003-10-08 Thread Saurav Pathak
hi, i am using mailman 2.1.1 and redhat 9. when the list admin receives a notification for a held message, the entire original mail is appended at the bottom. how can this be disabled, so that only the short and crisp notification is sent to the list admin? i have looked at the admin webpages,

[Mailman-Users] mailman+spamassassin

2003-09-22 Thread Saurav Pathak
Maybe this isn't strictly a mailman problem, but I am hoping someone here has a solution. I use spamassassin to pre-filter mails, before passing them on to mailman. this i do by running spamassassin from a procmail file, and then catching the spam in mailman from the spamassassin added header, ju

[Mailman-Users] addresses in archive

2003-07-23 Thread Saurav Pathak
hi, i must say first that i am very happy with mailman, which is working great. thanks to the developers. my problem at the moment is with the archive. i want to configure the archive such that email addresses are mangled. that is, archives don't show "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but "someone at some

Re: [Mailman-Users] spam filtering?

2003-06-27 Thread Saurav Pathak
Thus spake Jeff Warnica: + + What I would like is to have a simmilar setup if/when we migrate to + Mailman.. All our incomming mail is being scanned by SpamAssassin, so all + that mailman would need to do is check headers and hold for approval (or + discard as an option) messages with an

[Mailman-Users] pipermail configuration

2003-06-18 Thread Saurav Pathak
hi, how may i configure pipermail to munge email addresses to hide them from spambots? also, how do i munge addresses that appear on the mailman webpages (list admins, e.g)? thanks, -- saurav -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht