On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 18:02:27 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
> ...
> >Obviously, this would result in a lot of pickles that are constantly
> >opened, edited (and, periodically cleansed), and closed. Is the
> >performance cost/benefit prohibitive?
ver concurrently called for the same list -- is
that understanding accurate? -- which avoids the scenario in which we
are trying to simultaneously manipulate the same pickle.
--
Sahil Tandon
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
ht
alogue for our use-case, that
would do it. The goal is to check whether a tuple of (message-id,
listname) already exists in the dict and, if it does, raise
Errors.DiscardMessage; otherwise, add the tuple to the dict and do
nothing.
--
Sahil Tandon
-
fer
to do it via the mailing list manager if this is already possible.
Thanks,
--
Sahil Tandon
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
S
On Feb 5, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Sahil Tandon wrote:
>
>> I am seeing this error with all mail sent to just one (of several)
>> mailman mailing lists that are operating without problems. I found some
>> related discussions in the archives, but nothing
in the shunted pickle file? But in the beginning of the file
I see:
[- start pickle file -]
<- start object 1 ->
From owner-test-l...@tandon.net Sat Feb 4 20:31:45 2012
...
I do not see the U+201C and am stuck trying to figure out why all mail
(regardless of conten
